6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 b12382b436 ci: move the galactus deploy chain to a tag-only workflow
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-web (push) Successful in 1m39s
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-api (push) Successful in 2m17s
The deploy was a job inside build.yml gated by
`if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v')`. Gitea draws every job into the
run graph before it evaluates that `if`, so an ordinary push to master showed
a pending "Deploy to galactus" — indistinguishable from prod being about to be
redeployed off an unreleased commit, and the only safe reaction is to cancel
the run, which takes the images down with it.

The gate itself was never wrong (no deploy-galactus run has ever been created
from a branch ref), but a guarantee you cannot see is not much of a guarantee.
`on: push: tags: ["v*"]` in a workflow of its own makes it structural: the
deploy cannot appear on a master build because the workflow does not exist
there.

It replaces `needs: build` by polling the Actions API for the build.yml run at
this tag and requiring it green, so both images are still known to be in the
registry before anything is pulled. AUTO_DEPLOY_GALACTUS still cuts the chain.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 22:28:02 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 e85db73dbc ci: deploy to galactus automatically when a tag build goes green
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-web (push) Successful in 1m55s
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-api (push) Successful in 2m23s
Build and Push Images / Deploy to galactus (push) Skipped
Cutting a release then had one manual step left: watch build.yml and
dispatch "Deploy to galactus" by hand with the version. Chain it.

build.yml gains a `deploy` job, `needs: build` and gated on
refs/tags/v*, that dispatches deploy-galactus.yml against the tag with
tag=<version> scope=app bootstrap=false skip_migrate=false. `needs`
waits for both matrix legs, so api and web are both in the registry
before prod pulls either — deploy-galactus.yml only pulls, and a
half-pushed pair leaves prod running one new image and one old one.

A dispatch rather than a `workflow_run:` trigger (which Gitea has
supported since 1.24) because deploy-galactus.yml reads
github.event.inputs.* in ten places; under workflow_run all of them are
empty strings, so the deploy would run with no tag. The dispatch keeps
that workflow's contract intact and keeps it hand-runnable, which is
how rollbacks work.

The dispatch is confirmed the same way release.yml confirms the build
started: snapshot the existing deploy-galactus run ids first, then
require a new one to appear. An accepted dispatch that creates no run
is the failure mode that cost v1.0.3 its images, and a plain "is there
a deploy run" check would be satisfied by the previous release.

Kill switch: repo variable AUTO_DEPLOY_GALACTUS=false prints the manual
command instead of deploying. Needs the existing RELEASE_TOKEN secret;
preflight fails loudly and names the manual command if it is unset.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 21:48:23 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 e589bda28b ci(build): skip the redundant master build when a release is cut
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-api (push) Canceled after 1m10s
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-web (push) Canceled after 1m8s
release.yml pushes the release commit and its tag in a single `git push`,
so Gitea created two build.yml runs for the same commit. Only the tag run
matters: it emits the X.Y.Z and X.Y image tags, and since it is the same
commit it publishes `latest` and `sha-<short>` as well. The master run was
pure duplicate work that had to be waited out or cancelled by hand.

Guard the build job with an `if` that skips a branch push whose head commit
message starts with `chore(release):`. Ordinary pushes to master are
unaffected, and tag pushes and manual dispatches always build.

The skipped master run keeps the release commit's sha, which would have let
release.yml's "Verify build.yml started" check go green on it alone even if
the tag run were never created — the exact failure that check exists to
catch. It now also requires the run's ref to be the tag, falling back to the
sha match only when the API reports no ref.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 02:28:09 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 1934470d53 ci(release): dispatch the fallback build with a fully qualified ref
Gitea's workflow dispatch API 404s on a bare `v1.0.3` and accepts only
`refs/tags/v1.0.3`, so the fallback added in fdbe9fd would have failed
the release instead of rescuing it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 02:00:23 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 fdbe9fdb88 ci(release): fail the release when the build never starts
Gitea creates workflow runs from the post-receive hook. When that hook
errors the refs still land, git prints `remote: error: Internal Server
Error` and exits 0 — a post-receive failure does not fail a push. v1.0.3
was cut exactly that way: tag pushed, no build run created, no images
published, and the release step green. It surfaced two steps later as a
404 when the deploy tried to pull 1.0.3.

Capture the push output and warn on `remote: error`, then verify a
build.yml run actually exists for the new commit, dispatching it against
the tag if not. Fail the release if that does not take either, so a
release that publishes nothing is red instead of green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 01:58:10 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 a8afd87c3f ci: add a "Cut release" dispatch workflow
Stamps every package.json, commits chore(release): vX.Y.Z, tags and pushes
both refs in one dispatch — patch/minor/major, or an explicit number. Cutting
a release from a laptop is how a manifest bump gets forgotten or a tag lands
on an unpushed commit; the only input here is the number.

Guards: refuses a version that already exists as a tag (releases are
immutable), a no-op bump, a leading `v`, and a malformed number. Checkout is
full-depth because the duplicate-tag check is meaningless against a shallow
clone.

Pushes with a RELEASE_TOKEN PAT rather than the built-in Actions token —
whether a push made with that token re-triggers build.yml depends on the Gitea
version, and a release that quietly publishes no images is worse than one that
fails outright.

Builds and deploys stay separate: the tag push triggers build.yml, and
deploying remains a deliberate dispatch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 01:21:13 -07:00