2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 17d83291c3 feat(migration): refuse a full re-import that would delete native rows
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-web (push) Successful in 1m51s
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-api (push) Successful in 2m42s
A full run_all.py pass truncates and rebuilds every table it owns from the
Access extract. That was harmless while the platform was a read-only mirror --
every row came from the extract, so wiping and rebuilding lost nothing. It
stopped being harmless once the platform started minting rows Access has never
heard of: allocated portal NUMids, customers created in the staff UI,
OCR-captured policies, app-booked ledger rows, uploaded documents.

REIMPORT is a button in /operaciones, so that was one click away.

native_guard.py counts what only exists here and exits 3; run_all.py runs it
before the first truncate and stops. Detecting an allocated NUMid needs the
staged Parquet -- the customer holds an ordinary-looking (utilities, DATGRAL,
'1172') ref, so "customer has no refs" cannot see it and only comparing against
the extract can. Missing staging is therefore treated as blocking rather than
as "nothing to protect".

The guard does not teach full mode to preserve anything: --sync already upserts
legacy rows against the existing refs and leaves the rest alone, and rebuilding
that inside full mode would re-implement it. --force-full (checkbox in the
REIMPORT confirm, recorded in the audit log) deletes them deliberately.

Verified against dev: clean before, exit 3 listing utilities/1172 with a
synthetic ref present, clean again after removing it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 21:01:01 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 6a97242fc3 feat(customers): allocate portal NUMids, with an audit for reusable ones
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-web (push) Successful in 1m59s
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-api (push) Successful in 2m13s
Customers created in the staff UI had no NUMid and so could not log in to
my.jorgecuadros.com at all: the id is a CustomerLegacyRef row, not a column,
and create() deliberately writes none.

Allocation is a staff action (POST /customers/:id/portal-access, MANAGER)
rather than part of create, because insurance is expected to move to the
platform before utilities and an insurance-only customer has no reason to
spend a utilities id.

The audit that decides which ids are reusable took three passes. "Owns no
rows" matches nobody -- migration gave all 1,171 NUMids a property and a
transaction. "No transaction in N years" also matches nobody -- every customer
carries a synthetic Jan-1 opening-balance row, so everyone looks active this
year. Subtracting that row is what makes dormancy measurable, and it leaves 4
never-used ids and 10 dormant ones on dev. Two further traps are encoded in the
queries: insurance/DATGRAL is a separate id space that reuses the sourceTable
name and runs past 4,000, and ACCOUNT CANCELED is a transaction line type, not
an account state -- all 8 customers carrying it have current-year activity.

Recycling ships switched off (numid.recycleEmpty, default false). Every
reusable id still exists in Access DATGRAL, and a --sync run reassigns refs
with ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE customerId, so an id recycled before the utilities
cutover is silently handed back to its Access owner.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 20:04:13 -07:00