Backend already returns per-status counts via byStatus; render a real
progress bar (X% / N de M / en cola) while PENDING_OCR pages remain,
using the existing progress-track CSS. Falls back to indeterminate
when no docs have been reported yet.
Scanning a stack of bills and keying them in are the same daily job, ending
in the same ledger path, so OCR intake becomes a mode of the capture screen
instead of a second menu entry:
- components/Captura.tsx holds the mode switch; the manual check form moves
verbatim to components/ManualCheckCapture.tsx and the OCR intake to
components/StatementIntake.tsx.
- /estado-cuenta/lote opens on manual, /recibos on automatic — both render
Captura, so batch-review links and old bookmarks still land right.
- Nav drops "Recibos (OCR)"; "Captura" covers both, with a NavLink.aliases
field so /recibos still highlights it.
Also fixes the "El almacenamiento de documentos no está configurado" failure
staff hit on upload. Uploading with no object storage configured used to
succeed, then die on the first put minutes later, leaving a FAILED batch
whose only explanation was that string. createBatch now refuses up front,
GET /statements/status reports storageAvailable alongside ocrAvailable, and
the intake tab explains the situation instead of offering an upload that
cannot work. S3_* documented in .env.example (deploy stacks already set it).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Staff key 300+ utility statements per company per month by hand. This adds
the ingest -> split -> OCR -> match -> review pipeline that proposes customer
and amount per page instead (RECEIPT_CAPTURE_SPEC §2), posting through the
existing BillingService.createBatch seam with source=OCR and a per-document
captureRef so machine and hand capture share one write path and audit trail.
Everything was designed against 10 real scanned statements (46 pages of CFE,
CESPT and Telnor bills) rather than from the sample-free spec. The scans have
no text layer at all — they are camera images — so OCR is mandatory, and they
arrive bundled one customer per page. Measured on those pages the parser
identifies the provider 46/46 and reads an account reference 43/46; against
the dev database that is 39/46 (85%) exact auto-match, 40/46 identified, with
the rest genuine review cases. That closes the OCR-provider question in favour
of self-hosted Tesseract: it clears the bar for a queue where a human confirms
every row, and OcrProvider keeps a managed API a one-line swap.
The samples corrected three things the spec had wrong or unknown:
- Clave catastral is NOT predial. DATMEX.clave (934 rows) is what CESPT and
predial bills print; DATMEX.predial, which PROPERTY_TAX.accountNumber holds,
has 663 distinct values across 1135 rows and appears on no statement. The
clave now lives on Property.cadastralKey as the matcher's secondary key;
predial is left untouched. This had been blocking predial matching.
- Gas was recoverable: 160 of 334 DATMEX.gas values are real account numbers
(the rest are ESTACIONARIO/CILINDRO descriptors), now in GAS.meterNumber.
- Phone is one billed line per property (534/18/1 across phone1/2/3), so the
new TELEPHONE ServiceKind backfills from phone1 only, not three rows.
Matching is scoped to one column per service kind and never reads the customer
name — a CESPT receipt prints ARNAIZ ROSAS ELSA AURORA for an account this
office holds under CATT, RANDY, because the printed name is the registrant,
not the current owner. Where a provider prints a payment barcode it beats the
printed label (one CFE label OCR'd a digit too many while its barcode was
correct) and the two cross-check, with disagreement forcing review.
Confirming a document whose service had no reference writes it back, so gas
and any other cold start is a one-time cost rather than a permanent queue.
Verified end to end against the live dev API and MinIO: real scans uploaded
over HTTP, matched, confirmed against a check, and the resulting rows checked
in MySQL (negative amounts, captureSource=OCR, concept derived from the batch
kind, captureRef linking back to each page). Re-confirming a posted batch is
refused. Test data was removed afterwards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
rmancinas
