Companion to docs/RECEIPT_CAPTURE_SPEC.md — the insurance half of the
2026-07-25/26 meeting. Documentation only; no application code.
Verified against the code and a live query of the dev DB rather than
designed from the meeting notes alone, which changed several conclusions:
- Renewal emails and the liquidación batch are much smaller than they
look. RenewalNotice + its @@unique([policyId, generation]) idempotency
key and the aviso-renovacion letter body already exist; the per-policy
liquidation fields are wired end to end. What's missing is a scheduler,
a mail client, and the batch layer.
- Carrier research: ANA and GMX are one company (Grupo Valore). ANA
exposes a live SOAP service with a published operation list; GMX
publishes no machine interface at all. Every ANA operation serves
new-business quoting/issuance, not "list my book" — so the direction
question decides whether the feature is buildable.
- UTILSEG is unusable for Utilities↔Seguros reconciliation and the spec
closes that long-standing open question: DATGRAL.[NUM UTIL] is
authoritative (name match 298/563 vs 58/1024), and where the two
sources overlap they contradict on 170 of 218 shared ids.
Also records two live defects found while verifying: policy_types is
missing its INCENDIO and M_EMPR rows (the FK is ON DELETE SET NULL, so 5
m_empr policies silently lost their ramo), and the legacy settlement
slots don't match the target model (MULT/INCENDIO carry two, M EMPR
carries four, Policy collapses to one).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
