Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
rmancinasandClaude Opus 4.8 fa9b696752 Migration: prune customers with no business records
144 customers owned zero properties, zero policies and zero transactions —
the legacy DATGRAL row exists but nothing in either business line ever
attached to it. They padded the staff customer list with rows that can't be
acted on. 27 were also nameless (dead ID slots); the other 117 have real
names and sometimes contact details, and read as never-activated prospects
or lapsed clients rather than junk. Removing both sets is a deliberate call.

Implemented as a separate step rather than a filter inside
transform_customers.py: emptiness is only knowable after properties, policies
and transactions have loaded, and deciding it there would mean re-deriving
each downstream transform's source-matching logic against the staged Parquet.
Runs after transform_transactions.py in run_all.py.

Safe by construction — a customer with no rows in any of the three tables has
nothing pointing at it, so the delete cannot orphan anything; only its own
customer_legacy_refs go with it. The step asserts zero orphans afterwards.

Every pruned customer is written to output/pruned_customers.csv with its
legacy provenance before the delete, and --dry-run reports without touching
anything. Nothing is unrecoverable: the Access sources are untouched and a
pipeline run without this step brings them all back.

Verified: full run_all.py pass ends at 1538 customers (from 1682), with
1519 properties / 2378 policies / 45861 transactions all intact and zero
orphans. 17 nameless customers remain, all of which carry real records.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 21:06:08 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 4.8 594ee7cfca Migration: recover blank customer names from secondary legacy tables
DATGRAL.NOMBRE is blank on 266 legacy rows (140 utilities, 126 insurance),
which surfaced in the UI as 257 customers literally named "(SIN NOMBRE)".
The blank is real — those cells are empty in the Access files, not lost in
extraction — but the rows mostly are not junk: 176 of the 257 carry a
property, a policy, or transactions.

The old PHP importer handled this by skipping blank-name rows outright
(jorgecuadros-intra-webapp/src/tools/customerAdapter.php:47,81). That was
worse than it looks: every other adapter resolved its customer FK through
the customer_mapping table those skipped rows never entered, so their
properties and policies were silently dropped (customerServiceAdapter.php:45)
and their transactions were written against customer_id 0
(customerBalanceAdapter.php:52). So: recover the name instead of skipping.

Names come from the secondary tables that still carry them, most trustworthy
first — UTILSEG (the office's own hand-maintained name <-> id cross-reference
spanning both lines), then the billing runs (IVA 2015, COBRO3) and the policy
rows' NOMBRE ASEG (MULT, M EMPR, INCENDIO). A linked customer can also borrow
the name its insurance record resolved to. Result: 213 of 257 recovered, 44
still genuinely nameless anywhere in the source.

customers.nameSource records which table each recovered name came from, so a
reconstructed name is never mistaken for one that was really on the record —
the list tags it "nombre recuperado", the detail header names the source, and
a still-unnamed customer renders muted italic instead of as a normal name.

Also fixes run_all.py: transform_properties and transform_policies truncate
service_documents/policy_documents, but blob_extract.py was not in the step
list, so a full re-run left the uploaded MinIO objects with no rows pointing
at them. Hit exactly that while reloading for this change.

Verified end-to-end: full pipeline re-run against dev reproduces every prior
count (1682 customers, 1519 properties, 2378 policies, 45861 transactions,
22354 bank rows, 70 documents) with zero orphans, and both apps build clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 20:49:43 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 4.8 83e3cb8f47 Transform+load: shared ledger + SCOTHIA bank register (step 3 complete)
migration/transform_transactions.py unions every cash/billing ledger into
`transactions` per the reconciliation rules: both EFECTIVO tables (no folio
de-dup, near-disjoint), all three billing tables (disjoint periods), the FM3
fee stream (amount = fee+tax+multa), IVA 2015 (nominal date), and insurance
EFECTIVO (domain INSURANCE). Also loads the type_transactions (EN/ES) and
exchange_rates lookups. Customer FK resolves through customer_legacy_refs;
rows with no resolvable customer/date are skipped and counted.
Loaded (dev): 45861 transactions (UTILITY 45566 / INSURANCE 295, 0 orphans),
79 type_transactions, 2301 exchange_rates.

migration/transform_bank.py loads SCOTHIA DATOS I/E into bank_transactions as
signed amounts (income +, expense -) and TABLA RAMODOS into
business_line_categories. Deliberately customer-independent (office's own
checking account). Loaded (dev): 22354 bank_transactions (net +899,375.77),
66 categories; categoryId left null (concept->ramo classifier is future work).

run_all.py: pipeline now customers -> properties -> policies -> transactions
-> bank, all idempotent. Verified full end-to-end run against dev.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 18:43:34 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 4.8 21899e99bb Transform+load: consolidate all insurance lines into policies (step 3)
migration/transform_policies.py folds every insurance Access table into one
`policies` table (policy_types discriminator) plus child tables, via a
per-table declarative mapping that absorbs the column-name variance
(num_id/numer_id, no_poliza/poliza, p_neta/prima_neta/prima1). Any source
column not explicitly modeled — the type-specific coverage amounts — is
preserved verbatim in coveragesJson, so consolidation loses nothing.

Unpivots the hardcoded repeated slots: 4 payment installments (c_1er_pago +
pago_subsec x3), up to 3 vehicles (auto tables + MCA2), up to 3 named
insured drivers (MCA2 + LICENCIAS). Also loads BENEF -> policy_beneficiaries
(by policy number), DATOS -> claims, AJUSTADORES(+ATLAS) -> adjusters, and
builds policy_types + insurance_providers lookups.

Loaded/validated (dev): 2378 policies (AUTO 1307 / MULT 760 / LICENCIAS 306 /
M_EMPR 5; 10 skipped for unresolved customer FK, 0 orphans), 4678
installments, 1110 vehicles, 513 drivers, 126 beneficiaries, 1 claim, 15
providers, 17 adjusters — all child FKs verified 0 orphans. Spot-checked a
customer carrying both a utility property and MULT policies (the unified
cross-line view).

run_all.py: add policies to the ordered pipeline. Customer FK resolves
through insurance customer_legacy_refs, so this runs after customers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 18:36:29 -07:00
rmancinasandClaude Opus 4.8 a680ad2bb0 Transform+load: properties/services/trust + env-parameterize migration
migration/transform_properties.py loads properties, property_services and
trust_accounts from staged DATMEX/PROFILE, resolving each property's customer
FK through customer_legacy_refs. Services are derived from DATMEX's own
account/route/meter fields (the authoritative data); PROFILE flags — merged
best-effort on (numer_id,casa,direccion), which matched 1519/1519 — only
refine each service's `active`. Trust accounts are 1:1 from DATMEX trust
fields; TRUSTVENCE (overlapping) deferred to reconciliation; blobs are step 4.

Loaded/validated (dev): 1519 properties (0 orphans, 1 blank id skipped),
3486 services (ELECTRIC 1118 / PROPERTY_TAX 939 / WATER 859 / GAS 335 /
OTHER 115 / FEDERAL_ZONE 76 / CABLE 41 / ALARM 3), 553 trust accounts —
counts track the PROFILE enrollment flags.

Reproducibility (asked: dev must be redoable in prod):
- migration/dbenv.py: single DB-target source = deploy/.env.<env>'s
  DATABASE_URL; connect(env) + env_arg() (--env, default dev).
- transform_customers.py / transform_properties.py now take --env instead of
  hardcoding .env.dev.
- migration/run_all.py: runs every step in dependency order against --env
  (optional --stage re-extracts from Access first). Reproducing dev->prod is
  `run_all.py --env prod` after deploying the prod stack + prisma db push.

All steps are idempotent (truncate+rebuild); re-run yields identical counts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 18:29:31 -07:00