rmancinasandClaude Opus 5
2f9a9afc0d
EFECTIVO is a journal, not a ledger. The office writes a numbered paper receipt for money handed over the counter and then posts that same receipt to the utilities ledger as reference `C<folio>`. Legacy summed the ledger alone — ledger_repository.php reads `datosfreak`, materialized from DATOS2 only — but the migration flattened both tables into one `transactions` table, so every balance counted each counter payment twice. Confirmed against the live legacy database rather than inferred: of the 297 receipts written in 2026, 296 carry a matching DATOS2 posting. Six of them post converted to pesos under a mistyped folio, which is why matching pairs on folio and amount found fewer duplicates than exist — and why this excludes the whole journal instead of a list of confirmed pairs. Only folio 13536 (CL 717, $400 USD) has no posting anywhere; that one wants a human. The database qualifier is load-bearing. `SEGUROS 16_be` keeps its own table also called EFECTIVO, and that one is the insurance line's only ledger — nothing posts it anywhere else. Excluding by table name alone would erase 55,444.95 USD and 63,957.78 MXN across 102 customers, 99 of whom have no other rows at all. Extending the qualified rule to the statement and the customer file also gives those 99 back a statement that is not empty. The same queries were missing the archive window the statement already had, so the worklist and the book also counted a closed year twice for customers floored inside an archive. Measured on production, utilities MXN: NUMid 6 and 173 unchanged to the cent, 501 unchanged at -10,874.33 (still the portal's number), 10 drops 2,362.20 -> -1,137.80 (exactly the 3,500.00 duplicate), 295 drops 14,377.46 -> 4,377.46 — which is what his statement already said. The worklist and the statement now agree, which is the point. Left alone deliberately: the movement browser, which is inventory rather than balance and should still show what was captured; and stats()'s outstanding rows, which turn on a client decision that is still open. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>