Files
jorgecuadros-platform/apps/api/src/policy-ocr/policy-ocr.service.ts
T
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5 022d1935ad
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-web (push) Successful in 2m0s
Build and Push Images / Build jorgecuadros-api (push) Successful in 2m14s
feat(policy-ocr): set policyTypeId and insuranceProviderId on confirm
The BACKLOG claimed this was blocked on incomplete `policy_types` rows.
Querying the dev database says otherwise: AUTO (1316 policies) and LICENCIAS
(306) are both live and healthy, so ANA's two faces were never blocked at
all. Three separate things had been conflated.

What the parser now emits is a NAME, not an id -- it is a pure function over
text and must not reach for the database:

  ANA AUTOMOBILE        -> AUTO
  ANA DRIVER'S POLICY   -> LICENCIAS
  GMX (both documents)  -> MULT

`resolveLookups()` turns that into a foreign key at confirm, and does the
same for the carrier off the parser's provider code. It resolves, never
creates: a missing `policy_types` row means a human deleted it, and silently
recreating it would undo that with no record. An explicit `policyTypeId` /
`insuranceProviderId` on the confirm payload always wins.

GMX is MULT rather than INCENDIO because the caratula's own header reads
"Multiple Policy / Home" and the especificación is "PVL Hogar" -- one product,
two artifacts. MULT is the live row carrying 769 of them; INCENDIO is fire-only
and no policy in the book has ever used it.

The parser's provider code is not the carrier's row name, so PROVIDER_ROW_NAME
maps ANA onto "ANA SEGUROS", which is where the office's 738 ANA policies
already are.

--- the actual defect underneath -----------------------------------------

`policies.policyTypeId`, `policies.insuranceProviderId` and
`claims.adjusterId` are all ON DELETE SET NULL, and the lookups screen deleted
unconditionally. So deleting a lookup row returned 200 and silently blanked
the field on every row referencing it -- no error, nothing in the UI. That is
how M_EMPR disappeared and left 5 policies with no ramo, found months later
only by querying.

All three deletes now refuse while the row is in use, naming it and the count
("El tipo de póliza «M_EMPR» está en uso por 5 póliza(s)"). The schema-level
`onDelete: Restrict` the spec once recommended is deliberately not used: a raw
FK error is not something the operator can act on.

`20260815160000_policy_type_repair` cleans up what already happened:

  - restores M_EMPR and re-points its 5 policies, scoped to
    `policyTypeId IS NULL AND legacySourceTable = 'm_empr'` so it can never
    claim a policy blanked for some other reason
  - merges the duplicate "ANA" carrier (1 policy) into "ANA SEGUROS" (738).
    OCR is about to start assigning the carrier automatically and two rows
    would keep splitting the book. Written as joins, not subqueries, so both
    statements are no-ops when either row is absent -- a subquery form would
    resolve to NULL and blank the carrier off every ANA policy.
  - does NOT restore INCENDIO. It is the other row the migration would have
    produced, but the legacy INCENDIO table has 1 row that never loaded, so
    the type has zero policies and restoring it would only put a dead option
    in the type picker.

Verified by running the repair against the real broken dev data inside a
transaction and rolling back: 5 orphans -> 0, ANA/ANA SEGUROS -> one row with
739, and a second run in the same transaction changes nothing. The DDL half
matches `prisma migrate diff` exactly.

186 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-15 01:28:26 -07:00

994 lines
39 KiB
TypeScript

import {
BadRequestException,
Inject,
Injectable,
Logger,
NotFoundException,
} from "@nestjs/common";
import { Currency, Prisma } from "@jorgecuadros/database";
import { PrismaService } from "../prisma/prisma.service";
import { StorageService } from "../storage/storage.service";
import type { UploadedFileLike } from "../storage/upload-file";
import { OCR_PROVIDER, type OcrPage, type OcrProvider } from "../statements/ocr/ocr.provider";
import { parsePolicy, type ParsedDriver, type ParsedVehicle } from "./parsers/policy-parser";
import { PolicyMatcherService } from "./policy-matcher.service";
import type {
ConfirmPolicyBatchDto,
ConfirmPolicyDocumentDto,
ReviewPolicyDocumentDto,
} from "./policy-ocr.dto";
/**
* Insurance OCR intake — mirrors the statement pipeline at
* `apps/api/src/statements/statements.service.ts`. Reuses the OCR seam and
* Tesseract binding unchanged; the parsers and matcher are policy-specific.
*
* Why a parallel pipeline rather than a column on StatementDocument: the
* matcher keys on `Policy.policyNumber`, the confirm step writes to a
* different table (`Policy`, not `Transaction`), and the review UI shows
* different fields. Sharing one queue would either bloat the row with null
* columns or force the review screen to branch on a discriminator — both
* worse than a thin second table.
*/
@Injectable()
export class PolicyOcrService {
private readonly logger = new Logger(PolicyOcrService.name);
constructor(
private readonly prisma: PrismaService,
private readonly storage: StorageService,
private readonly matcher: PolicyMatcherService,
@Inject(OCR_PROVIDER) private readonly ocr: OcrProvider,
) {}
ocrAvailable(): Promise<boolean> {
return this.ocr.available();
}
storageAvailable(): boolean {
return this.storage.available;
}
// --- ingest ---------------------------------------------------------------
async createBatch(
files: UploadedFileLike[],
uploadedById: string,
label?: string,
) {
if (!files?.length) throw new BadRequestException("No se recibió ningún archivo.");
if (!(await this.ocr.available())) {
throw new BadRequestException(
"El servidor no tiene OCR instalado; no se pueden leer PDFs de pólizas.",
);
}
if (!this.storage.available) {
throw new BadRequestException(
"El almacenamiento de documentos no está configurado; no se pueden " +
"guardar los PDFs escaneados.",
);
}
// The provider is not asked of the uploader and not assumed: `process`
// sets it from what the parsers actually claimed, so the batch label can
// never contradict its own documents. Until then it says so.
const batch = await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.create({
data: { provider: "por detectar", uploadedById, label, fileCount: files.length },
});
const copies = files.map((f) => ({ buffer: f.buffer, name: f.originalname }));
void this.process(batch.id, copies).catch(async (err) => {
this.logger.error(`Policy OCR batch ${batch.id} failed: ${(err as Error).message}`);
await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.update({
where: { id: batch.id },
data: { status: "FAILED", error: (err as Error).message },
});
});
return batch;
}
/**
* Render → text → parse → match, **one PolicyOcrDocument row per uploaded
* file**. The GMX certificate is a 2-page PDF where page 1 carries the
* contract header and page 2 carries the per-coverage table — both pages
* describe the SAME policy, so the parser concatenates them and the
* matcher runs once. `pageNumber` on the row is repurposed as the file
* ordinal within the batch (1, 2, 3…) — the unique constraint
* `(batchId, pageNumber)` still holds and lets a single batch carry many
* policies.
*
* The doc's `storageKey` is the SOURCE PDF (`policy-ocr/{batchId}/source-N.pdf`)
* rather than a rendered page image, so the review screen can embed the
* exact artifact the office received. The rendered page PNGs are still
* stored under `policy-ocr/{batchId}/page-M.png` for any future re-OCR or
* image-based audit, but they aren't used as `storageKey` for the document.
*/
private async process(
batchId: string,
files: { buffer: Buffer; name?: string }[],
) {
await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.update({
where: { id: batchId },
data: { status: "PROCESSING" },
});
let fileOrdinal = 0;
let globalPageOrdinal = 0;
const providersSeen = new Set<string>();
for (const file of files) {
fileOrdinal += 1;
const sourceKey = `policy-ocr/${batchId}/source-${fileOrdinal}.pdf`;
await this.storage.put(sourceKey, file.buffer, "application/pdf");
const pages = await this.ocr.renderPages(file.buffer);
const textLayer = await this.ocr.textPages(file.buffer).catch(() => []);
// One OcrPage per rendered page: text-layer wins when present (cheap,
// exact), OCR the rendered image when it isn't. Same precedence rule
// as the statement OCR pipeline.
const perPageOcr: OcrPage[] = [];
for (const [index, image] of pages.entries()) {
globalPageOrdinal += 1;
const pageStorageKey = `policy-ocr/${batchId}/page-${globalPageOrdinal}.png`;
await this.storage.put(pageStorageKey, image, "image/png");
const embedded = textLayer[index] ?? null;
const pageOcr = embedded ?? (await this.ocr.recognize(image));
perPageOcr.push(pageOcr);
}
// Concatenate every page's text with a blank line between pages so the
// parser's anchored regexes (^From$, ^Currency\s+...) still work
// across page boundaries — pdftotext -bbox-layout produces newline-
// separated text per page already, the `\n\n` just preserves a clear
// boundary in ocrRawText for debugging.
const mergedText = perPageOcr.map((p) => p.text).join("\n\n");
const avgConfidence =
perPageOcr.length === 0
? 0
: perPageOcr.reduce((s, p) => s + p.confidence, 0) / perPageOcr.length;
const synthetic: OcrPage = {
text: mergedText,
words: [],
confidence: avgConfidence,
};
try {
const parsed = parsePolicy(synthetic);
if (parsed.provider === "") {
throw new Error("no se reconoció el proveedor");
}
providersSeen.add(parsed.provider);
const match = await this.matcher.match(parsed);
const notes = [...parsed.notes, match.note].filter(Boolean);
// Confident when exactly one Policy carries the printed number —
// the only unambiguous hit we trust. A new policy (no match) still
// needs a customer pick, so it stays in review.
const trusted = match.confident && parsed.policyNumber != null;
await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.create({
data: {
batchId,
pageNumber: fileOrdinal,
storageKey: sourceKey,
status: trusted ? "MATCHED" : "NEEDS_REVIEW",
ocrRawText: mergedText,
ocrConfidence: new Prisma.Decimal(avgConfidence.toFixed(3)),
provider: parsed.provider,
extractedPolicyNumber: parsed.policyNumber,
extractedInsuredName: parsed.insuredName,
extractedAdditionalInsured: parsed.additionalInsured,
extractedAgentName: parsed.agentName,
extractedLegalAddress: parsed.legalAddress,
extractedZip: parsed.zip,
extractedPolicyFrom: parsed.policyFrom,
extractedPolicyTo: parsed.policyTo,
extractedPolicyDate: parsed.policyDate,
extractedCurrency: parsed.currency,
extractedNetPremium:
parsed.netPremium != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(parsed.netPremium) : null,
extractedPolicyFee:
parsed.policyFee != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(parsed.policyFee) : null,
extractedBrokerFee:
parsed.brokerFee != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(parsed.brokerFee) : null,
extractedTotal:
parsed.total != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(parsed.total) : null,
extractedCoveragesJson: parsed.coverages.length
? (parsed.coverages as unknown as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: Prisma.DbNull,
extractedPremiumPayment: parsed.premiumPayment,
extractedCoveragePeriodDays: parsed.coveragePeriodDays,
extractedVehiclesJson: parsed.vehicles.length
? (parsed.vehicles as unknown as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: Prisma.DbNull,
extractedDriversJson: parsed.drivers.length
? (parsed.drivers as unknown as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: Prisma.DbNull,
extractedPolicyTypeName: parsed.policyTypeName,
matchedPolicyId: match.policyId,
matchedCustomerId: match.customerId,
matchCandidates: match.candidates.length
? (match.candidates as unknown as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: Prisma.DbNull,
matchNote: notes.join("; "),
},
});
} catch (err) {
// The file as a whole failed to parse (no provider, parse exception).
// One OCR_FAILED row per file is the right granularity — the page
// images are still on disk for a re-run after a parser fix.
await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.create({
data: {
batchId,
pageNumber: fileOrdinal,
storageKey: sourceKey,
status: "OCR_FAILED",
matchNote: (err as Error).message,
},
});
}
}
await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.update({
where: { id: batchId },
data: {
status: "READY_FOR_REVIEW",
// Whatever the parsers claimed. A mixed upload is labelled as mixed
// rather than as whichever provider happened to come first — the
// review header is the only place staff see what they dropped in.
provider: [...providersSeen].sort().join(" + ") || "desconocido",
},
});
}
// --- reads ----------------------------------------------------------------
async listBatches(page: number, pageSize: number) {
const [total, items] = await this.prisma.$transaction([
this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.count(),
this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.findMany({
orderBy: { createdAt: "desc" },
skip: (page - 1) * pageSize,
take: pageSize,
include: {
uploadedBy: { select: { name: true } },
_count: { select: { documents: true } },
},
}),
]);
return { items, total, page, pageSize, pageCount: Math.ceil(total / pageSize) };
}
async getBatch(id: string) {
const batch = await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.findUnique({
where: { id },
include: { uploadedBy: { select: { name: true } } },
});
if (!batch) throw new NotFoundException("Lote no encontrado.");
const counts = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.groupBy({
by: ["status"],
where: { batchId: id },
_count: { _all: true },
});
return {
...batch,
byStatus: Object.fromEntries(counts.map((c) => [c.status, c._count._all])),
};
}
async listDocuments(batchId: string) {
return this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.findMany({
where: { batchId },
orderBy: { pageNumber: "asc" },
include: {
matchedCustomer: { select: { id: true, name: true } },
matchedPolicy: {
select: {
id: true,
policyNumber: true,
customerId: true,
customer: { select: { name: true } },
},
},
},
});
}
/**
* The source PDF for the document, so the review screen can show the
* exact artifact the office uploaded (the browser's PDF viewer handles
* scrolling, zoom, and selection natively). The rendered page PNGs
* remain on disk under `policy-ocr/{batchId}/page-N.png` for any
* future re-OCR, but the doc row points here at the source.
*/
async pageImage(documentId: string) {
const doc = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.findUnique({
where: { id: documentId },
select: { storageKey: true },
});
if (!doc) throw new NotFoundException("Documento no encontrado.");
return this.storage.getStream(doc.storageKey);
}
// --- review ---------------------------------------------------------------
async review(id: string, dto: ReviewPolicyDocumentDto, reviewedById: string) {
const doc = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.findUnique({ where: { id } });
if (!doc) throw new NotFoundException("Documento no encontrado.");
if (doc.status === "POSTED") {
throw new BadRequestException("Este documento ya fue aplicado.");
}
// Trusting a customer-supplied pair (policyId, customerId) without
// cross-check is how a document lands on the wrong customer's ledger;
// pin them here from the DB.
let matchedPolicyId = dto.matchedPolicyId ?? doc.matchedPolicyId;
let matchedCustomerId = doc.matchedCustomerId;
if (matchedPolicyId) {
const p = await this.prisma.policy.findUnique({
where: { id: matchedPolicyId },
select: { customerId: true },
});
if (!p) throw new BadRequestException("Póliza no encontrada.");
matchedCustomerId = p.customerId;
} else if (dto.matchedCustomerId) {
const c = await this.prisma.customer.findUnique({
where: { id: dto.matchedCustomerId },
select: { id: true },
});
if (!c) throw new BadRequestException("Cliente no encontrado.");
matchedCustomerId = c.id;
}
return this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.update({
where: { id },
data: {
extractedPolicyNumber: dto.policyNumber ?? undefined,
extractedInsuredName: dto.insuredName ?? undefined,
extractedAdditionalInsured: dto.additionalInsured ?? undefined,
extractedAgentName: dto.agentName ?? undefined,
extractedLegalAddress: dto.legalAddress ?? undefined,
extractedZip: dto.zip ?? undefined,
extractedPolicyFrom: dto.policyFrom ? new Date(dto.policyFrom) : undefined,
extractedPolicyTo: dto.policyTo ? new Date(dto.policyTo) : undefined,
extractedPolicyDate: dto.policyDate ? new Date(dto.policyDate) : undefined,
extractedCurrency: dto.currency ?? undefined,
extractedNetPremium:
dto.netPremium != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(dto.netPremium) : undefined,
extractedPolicyFee:
dto.policyFee != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(dto.policyFee) : undefined,
extractedBrokerFee:
dto.brokerFee != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(dto.brokerFee) : undefined,
extractedTotal:
dto.total != null ? new Prisma.Decimal(dto.total) : undefined,
extractedCoveragesJson: dto.coveragesJson
? (dto.coveragesJson as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: undefined,
extractedPremiumPayment: dto.premiumPayment ?? undefined,
extractedCoveragePeriodDays: dto.coveragePeriodDays ?? undefined,
matchedPolicyId,
matchedCustomerId,
status: dto.forceConfirm ? "CONFIRMED" : "MATCHED",
reviewedById,
reviewedAt: new Date(),
},
});
}
async reject(id: string, reviewedById: string) {
const doc = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.findUnique({ where: { id } });
if (!doc) throw new NotFoundException("Documento no encontrado.");
if (doc.status === "POSTED") {
throw new BadRequestException("Este documento ya fue aplicado.");
}
const updated = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.update({
where: { id },
data: { status: "REJECTED", reviewedById, reviewedAt: new Date() },
});
// Rejecting the last open page settles the batch just as confirming it
// would — without this, a fully-rejected batch sat in READY_FOR_REVIEW
// forever because only confirmBatch() ever closed one.
await this.closeIfDone(doc.batchId);
return updated;
}
/**
* Throw away a whole batch that is pending review: every page that has not
* been applied is marked REJECTED and the batch itself becomes DISCARDED.
*
* Refuses once any page is POSTED — a partly-applied batch has already
* written Policy (and possibly Transaction) rows, and hiding the paperwork
* behind a "discarded" label would leave those rows unexplained. Reject the
* remaining pages individually instead.
*/
async discardBatch(batchId: string, reviewedById: string) {
const batch = await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.findUnique({
where: { id: batchId },
});
if (!batch) throw new NotFoundException("Lote no encontrado.");
if (batch.status === "DISCARDED") {
throw new BadRequestException("Este lote ya fue descartado.");
}
const posted = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.count({
where: { batchId, status: "POSTED" },
});
if (posted > 0) {
throw new BadRequestException(
`No se puede descartar: ${posted} página(s) ya se aplicaron a una póliza.`,
);
}
const { count } = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.updateMany({
where: { batchId, status: { notIn: ["POSTED", "REJECTED"] } },
data: { status: "REJECTED", reviewedById, reviewedAt: new Date() },
});
await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.update({
where: { id: batchId },
data: { status: "DISCARDED", completedAt: new Date() },
});
return { batchId, rejected: count };
}
// --- confirm --------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Apply every confirmed document: create or update the Policy, attach the
* source PDF as a PolicyDocument, and (when staff asked + premium parses)
* write a Transaction row. Each step is guarded by status checks so a
* double-confirm cannot re-apply a document.
*/
async confirmBatch(batchId: string, dto: ConfirmPolicyBatchDto, reviewedById: string) {
const batch = await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.findUnique({ where: { id: batchId } });
if (!batch) throw new NotFoundException("Lote no encontrado.");
const results: { documentId: string; policyId: string; postedTransactionId: string | null }[] = [];
for (const item of dto.documents) {
const doc = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.findUnique({
where: { id: item.documentId },
});
if (!doc) {
throw new BadRequestException(`Documento ${item.documentId} no encontrado.`);
}
if (doc.status === "POSTED") {
throw new BadRequestException(
`El documento página ${doc.pageNumber} ya fue aplicado.`,
);
}
if (!item.policyId && !item.customerId) {
throw new BadRequestException(
`Documento página ${doc.pageNumber}: falta póliza destino o cliente.`,
);
}
// 1. Resolve the lookup rows the parser can only name. The reviewer's
// explicit pick always wins; the parsed name is the fallback.
const lookups = await this.resolveLookups(item, doc);
// 2. Resolve target Policy (create or update). Field selection: every
// non-null `extracted*` on the doc (post-review) is written. Null is
// preserved — never overwrite an existing Policy's `netPremium` with
// null because the certificate page didn't carry one.
let policyId = item.policyId ?? null;
if (policyId) {
const updateData = buildPolicyUpdateFromDoc(item, doc, lookups);
await this.prisma.policy.update({
where: { id: policyId },
data: updateData,
});
} else {
// Create under the picked customer. `policyNumber` is the only field
// that must be present.
if (!item.policyNumber && !doc.extractedPolicyNumber) {
throw new BadRequestException(
`Documento página ${doc.pageNumber}: falta número de póliza.`,
);
}
const createData = buildPolicyCreateFromDoc(item, doc, item.customerId!, lookups);
const created = await this.prisma.policy.create({
data: createData,
});
policyId = created.id;
}
// 3. Vehicles and named drivers, for the providers whose face carries
// them (ANA's automobile and driver's policies; never GMX Hogar).
await this.applyVehiclesAndDrivers(doc, policyId);
// 4. Attach the source PDF as a PolicyDocument. `doc.storageKey`
// already points at the exact upload (`policy-ocr/{batchId}/source-N.pdf`)
// so the attach is just a stream copy into the policy's namespace —
// the previous per-page "which file did this page come from" walk is
// gone because one PDF = one doc now.
await this.attachSourcePdf(doc.storageKey, policyId, doc.provider);
// 5. Optionally post the premium to the ledger. Only when staff
// explicitly asked (`postPremium` true) and netPremium parses — without
// that gate a missing premium would silently book $0.
let postedTransactionId: string | null = null;
const premium =
item.netPremium != null
? item.netPremium
: doc.extractedNetPremium != null
? Number(doc.extractedNetPremium)
: null;
if (item.postPremium && premium && premium > 0) {
const tx = await this.prisma.transaction.create({
data: {
customerId: (await this.policyCustomerId(policyId))!,
domain: "INSURANCE",
amount: new Prisma.Decimal(-Math.abs(premium)),
transactionDate: doc.extractedPolicyDate ?? doc.extractedPolicyFrom ?? new Date(),
currency: (item.currency ??
doc.extractedCurrency ??
"MXN") as Currency,
reference: item.policyNumber ?? doc.extractedPolicyNumber ?? null,
period: null,
captureSource: "OCR",
captureRef: doc.id,
message: `Prima de póliza ${item.policyNumber ?? doc.extractedPolicyNumber ?? ""}`,
},
});
postedTransactionId = tx.id;
}
await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.update({
where: { id: doc.id },
data: {
status: "POSTED",
matchedPolicyId: policyId,
reviewedById,
reviewedAt: new Date(),
createdPolicyId: item.policyId ? null : policyId,
postedTransactionId,
},
});
results.push({
documentId: doc.id,
policyId,
postedTransactionId,
});
}
await this.closeIfDone(batchId);
return {
applied: results.length,
policies: results.map((r) => r.policyId),
postedTransactions: results.filter((r) => r.postedTransactionId).length,
};
}
/**
* Turn the two things the parser can only NAME into foreign keys.
*
* The parser is a pure function over text and never touches the database,
* so it emits `policyTypeName` ("AUTO") and `provider` ("ANA"). Resolving
* them here keeps that boundary and means a renamed lookup row is a data
* change rather than a parser change.
*
* **Resolve, never create.** A missing `policy_types` row is a signal that
* a human deleted it (that is exactly how M_EMPR disappeared), and silently
* recreating it would undo that decision with no record. The field stays
* null and the reviewer can add the row through the lookups screen.
*
* An explicit pick from the reviewer always beats the parsed name.
*/
private async resolveLookups(
item: ConfirmPolicyDocumentDto,
doc: { extractedPolicyTypeName: string | null; provider: string | null },
): Promise<{ policyTypeId?: string; insuranceProviderId?: string }> {
const out: { policyTypeId?: string; insuranceProviderId?: string } = {};
if (item.policyTypeId) {
out.policyTypeId = item.policyTypeId;
} else if (doc.extractedPolicyTypeName) {
const row = await this.prisma.policyType.findUnique({
where: { name: doc.extractedPolicyTypeName },
select: { id: true },
});
if (row) out.policyTypeId = row.id;
}
if (item.insuranceProviderId) {
out.insuranceProviderId = item.insuranceProviderId;
} else if (doc.provider) {
const name = PROVIDER_ROW_NAME[doc.provider] ?? doc.provider;
const row = await this.prisma.insuranceProvider.findFirst({
where: { name },
select: { id: true },
});
if (row) out.insuranceProviderId = row.id;
}
return out;
}
/**
* Write the parsed `Vehicle` and `InsuredDriver` rows onto the policy.
*
* Both inserts are skipped when an equivalent row is already on the policy.
* The reason is `confirmBatch` applying to an EXISTING policy: the office
* uploads a renewal for a car already on file, and a blind insert would
* leave the customer with the same VIN listed twice with no way to tell
* which row the renewal belongs to. Matching is on the identifier the
* document actually prints — the VIN for a vehicle (falling back to the
* plate, since ANA's TRAILER/TOWING slots have no VIN), the licence number
* for a driver (falling back to the name).
*
* Nothing is ever updated or deleted here. A vehicle whose plate changed
* lands as a second row for a human to reconcile, which is the safe half
* of the mistake: an over-write would destroy the only record of what was
* insured last term.
*/
private async applyVehiclesAndDrivers(
doc: { extractedVehiclesJson: Prisma.JsonValue | null; extractedDriversJson: Prisma.JsonValue | null },
policyId: string,
): Promise<void> {
const vehicles = asArray<ParsedVehicle>(doc.extractedVehiclesJson);
const drivers = asArray<ParsedDriver>(doc.extractedDriversJson);
if (vehicles.length === 0 && drivers.length === 0) return;
const policy = await this.prisma.policy.findUnique({
where: { id: policyId },
select: { customerId: true },
});
if (!policy) return;
if (vehicles.length) {
const existing = await this.prisma.vehicle.findMany({
where: { policyId },
select: { vinNumber: true, licensePlate: true },
});
const seen = new Set(
existing.flatMap((v) =>
[v.vinNumber, v.licensePlate].filter((k): k is string => !!k).map(norm),
),
);
for (const v of vehicles) {
const key = norm(v.vinNumber ?? v.licensePlate ?? "");
if (!key || seen.has(key)) continue;
seen.add(key);
await this.prisma.vehicle.create({
data: {
policyId,
customerId: policy.customerId,
make: v.make,
// ANA prints one BODY cell, not separate model/body columns, so
// it lands on `bodyType`; `model` stays null rather than being
// guessed out of the same string.
bodyType: v.bodyType,
modelYear: v.modelYear,
vinNumber: v.vinNumber,
licensePlate: v.licensePlate,
// "VEHICLE" / "TRAILER" / "TOWING" — the printed slot, which is
// the difference between the insured car and the trailer behind
// it and has no column of its own.
notes: v.item && v.item !== "VEHICLE" ? v.item : null,
},
});
}
}
if (drivers.length) {
const existing = await this.prisma.insuredDriver.findMany({
where: { policyId },
select: { licenseNumber: true, fullName: true },
});
const seen = new Set(
existing.flatMap((d) =>
[d.licenseNumber, d.fullName].filter((k): k is string => !!k).map(norm),
),
);
for (const d of drivers) {
const key = norm(d.licenseNumber ?? d.fullName ?? "");
if (!key || seen.has(key)) continue;
seen.add(key);
await this.prisma.insuredDriver.create({
data: { policyId, fullName: d.fullName, licenseNumber: d.licenseNumber },
});
}
}
}
/**
* Stream the source PDF (`sourceKey`, set by `process` on the doc row)
* into the policy's storage namespace and create a `PolicyDocument`
* pointer. Trivial now that the doc row holds the exact source key —
* the old per-page "which file did this page come from" walk is gone.
*/
private async attachSourcePdf(
sourceKey: string,
policyId: string,
provider: string | null,
): Promise<void> {
const got = await this.storage.getStream(sourceKey);
const chunks: Buffer[] = [];
for await (const c of got.stream) chunks.push(c as Buffer);
const buf = Buffer.concat(chunks);
const newKey = `policy/${policyId}/${Date.now()}-${crypto.randomUUID()}.pdf`;
await this.storage.put(newKey, buf, "application/pdf");
await this.prisma.policyDocument.create({
data: {
policyId,
// Named after whichever parser claimed the page. Was hardcoded
// `GMX_POLICY`, which mislabelled every ANA upload as a GMX
// document in the policy's file list.
documentType: `${provider ?? "OCR"}_POLICY`,
storageKey: newKey,
},
});
}
private async policyCustomerId(policyId: string): Promise<string | null> {
const p = await this.prisma.policy.findUnique({
where: { id: policyId },
select: { customerId: true },
});
return p?.customerId ?? null;
}
private async closeIfDone(batchId: string) {
const open = await this.prisma.policyOcrDocument.count({
where: {
batchId,
status: { in: ["PENDING_OCR", "NEEDS_REVIEW", "MATCHED", "CONFIRMED"] },
},
});
if (open === 0) {
await this.prisma.policyOcrBatch.updateMany({
// `updateMany` + a status filter so a discarded batch is never quietly
// relabelled COMPLETED by a late reject on one of its pages.
where: { id: batchId, status: { not: "DISCARDED" } },
data: { status: "COMPLETED", completedAt: new Date() },
});
}
}
}
/**
* The parser's provider code is not the carrier's row name in
* `insurance_providers`, and the two namespaces are allowed to differ.
*
* ANA is the case that forces this: the office's book is filed under
* "ANA SEGUROS" (738 policies). A bare "ANA" row also existed with 1 policy
* and is merged away by `20260815160000_policy_type_repair`, so an exact-name
* lookup on the parser's "ANA" would find nothing at all after that migration.
*
* Anything not listed resolves by its own name.
*/
const PROVIDER_ROW_NAME: Record<string, string> = {
ANA: "ANA SEGUROS",
};
/** The lookup FKs resolved for one document, absent when unresolvable. */
interface ResolvedLookups {
policyTypeId?: string;
insuranceProviderId?: string;
}
/** Map a (post-review) doc + final confirmed fields onto a `Policy.update`
* payload. Every field that is null in both inputs is omitted so we never
* write null over a value the Policy already carries (the GMX certificate
* has no premium — we must not blank the existing Policy.netPremium). */
function buildPolicyUpdateFromDoc(
item: ConfirmPolicyDocumentDto,
doc: {
extractedPolicyNumber: string | null;
extractedInsuredName: string | null;
extractedAdditionalInsured: string | null;
extractedAgentName: string | null;
extractedLegalAddress: string | null;
extractedZip: string | null;
extractedPolicyFrom: Date | null;
extractedPolicyTo: Date | null;
extractedPolicyDate: Date | null;
extractedCurrency: string | null;
extractedNetPremium: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedPolicyFee: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedBrokerFee: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedTotal: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedCoveragesJson: Prisma.JsonValue | null;
extractedPremiumPayment: string | null;
extractedCoveragePeriodDays: number | null;
},
lookups: ResolvedLookups,
): Prisma.PolicyUpdateInput {
const numOrUndef = (a: number | undefined, b: Prisma.Decimal | null): Prisma.Decimal | undefined => {
if (a != null) return new Prisma.Decimal(a);
if (b != null) return b;
return undefined;
};
const dateOrUndef = (a: string | undefined, b: Date | null): Date | undefined => {
if (a) return new Date(a);
if (b) return b;
return undefined;
};
const strOrUndef = (a: string | undefined, b: string | null): string | undefined => {
if (a != null && a !== "") return a;
if (b != null && b !== "") return b;
return undefined;
};
return {
policyNumber: strOrUndef(item.policyNumber, doc.extractedPolicyNumber),
// `connect` rather than a raw id: this is the CHECKED update input. Left
// undefined when unresolved, so an existing Policy never loses a type or
// carrier it already had because this document could not name one.
policyType: lookups.policyTypeId ? { connect: { id: lookups.policyTypeId } } : undefined,
insuranceProvider: lookups.insuranceProviderId
? { connect: { id: lookups.insuranceProviderId } }
: undefined,
agentName: strOrUndef(item.agentName, doc.extractedAgentName),
policyFrom: dateOrUndef(item.policyFrom, doc.extractedPolicyFrom),
policyTo: dateOrUndef(item.policyTo, doc.extractedPolicyTo),
policyDate: dateOrUndef(item.policyDate, doc.extractedPolicyDate),
// Left undefined when the document didn't print a term, so the schema
// default (365) stands for GMX. ANA's by-the-day policies DO print one,
// and the default would otherwise turn a 4-day tourist policy into an
// annual one on the renewals screen.
coveragePeriodDays:
item.coveragePeriodDays ?? doc.extractedCoveragePeriodDays ?? undefined,
currency: strOrUndef(item.currency, doc.extractedCurrency) as Currency | undefined,
netPremium: numOrUndef(item.netPremium, doc.extractedNetPremium),
policyFee: numOrUndef(item.policyFee, doc.extractedPolicyFee),
brokerFee: numOrUndef(item.brokerFee, doc.extractedBrokerFee),
total: numOrUndef(item.total, doc.extractedTotal),
// coveragesJson / observations: freeform, keep the GMX data when present.
coveragesJson:
item.coveragesJson !== undefined
? (item.coveragesJson as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: doc.extractedCoveragesJson != null
? (doc.extractedCoveragesJson as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: undefined,
// Premium payment cadence ("CONTADO") and insured-name fields land in
// `observations` so the PolicyForm's edits stay the source of truth for
// structured fields. The reviewer can move them by hand if needed.
observations: joinObservations(
doc.extractedInsuredName,
doc.extractedAdditionalInsured,
doc.extractedLegalAddress,
doc.extractedZip,
doc.extractedPremiumPayment,
item,
),
};
}
/** Same shape as `buildPolicyUpdateFromDoc`, but for `Policy.create`. The
* `customerId` is supplied separately and `policyNumber` is required (a
* Policy without a number can't be re-matched by the OCR pipeline). */
function buildPolicyCreateFromDoc(
item: ConfirmPolicyDocumentDto,
doc: {
extractedPolicyNumber: string | null;
extractedInsuredName: string | null;
extractedAdditionalInsured: string | null;
extractedAgentName: string | null;
extractedLegalAddress: string | null;
extractedZip: string | null;
extractedPolicyFrom: Date | null;
extractedPolicyTo: Date | null;
extractedPolicyDate: Date | null;
extractedCurrency: string | null;
extractedNetPremium: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedPolicyFee: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedBrokerFee: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedTotal: Prisma.Decimal | null;
extractedCoveragesJson: Prisma.JsonValue | null;
extractedPremiumPayment: string | null;
extractedCoveragePeriodDays: number | null;
},
customerId: string,
lookups: ResolvedLookups,
): Prisma.PolicyUncheckedCreateInput {
const numOrUndef = (a: number | undefined, b: Prisma.Decimal | null): Prisma.Decimal | undefined => {
if (a != null) return new Prisma.Decimal(a);
if (b != null) return b;
return undefined;
};
const dateOrUndef = (a: string | undefined, b: Date | null): Date | undefined => {
if (a) return new Date(a);
if (b) return b;
return undefined;
};
const strOrUndef = (a: string | undefined, b: string | null): string | undefined => {
if (a != null && a !== "") return a;
if (b != null && b !== "") return b;
return undefined;
};
const policyNumber =
strOrUndef(item.policyNumber, doc.extractedPolicyNumber);
if (!policyNumber) {
// Caller already guards this; the throw is a type-narrowing aid.
throw new Error("policyNumber required for create");
}
return {
policyNumber,
customerId,
policyTypeId: lookups.policyTypeId,
insuranceProviderId: lookups.insuranceProviderId,
agentName: strOrUndef(item.agentName, doc.extractedAgentName),
policyFrom: dateOrUndef(item.policyFrom, doc.extractedPolicyFrom),
policyTo: dateOrUndef(item.policyTo, doc.extractedPolicyTo),
policyDate: dateOrUndef(item.policyDate, doc.extractedPolicyDate),
// Left undefined when the document didn't print a term, so the schema
// default (365) stands for GMX. ANA's by-the-day policies DO print one,
// and the default would otherwise turn a 4-day tourist policy into an
// annual one on the renewals screen.
coveragePeriodDays:
item.coveragePeriodDays ?? doc.extractedCoveragePeriodDays ?? undefined,
currency: strOrUndef(item.currency, doc.extractedCurrency) as Currency | undefined,
netPremium: numOrUndef(item.netPremium, doc.extractedNetPremium),
policyFee: numOrUndef(item.policyFee, doc.extractedPolicyFee),
brokerFee: numOrUndef(item.brokerFee, doc.extractedBrokerFee),
total: numOrUndef(item.total, doc.extractedTotal),
coveragesJson:
item.coveragesJson !== undefined
? (item.coveragesJson as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: doc.extractedCoveragesJson != null
? (doc.extractedCoveragesJson as Prisma.InputJsonValue)
: undefined,
observations: joinObservations(
doc.extractedInsuredName,
doc.extractedAdditionalInsured,
doc.extractedLegalAddress,
doc.extractedZip,
doc.extractedPremiumPayment,
item,
),
};
}
function joinObservations(
insured: string | null,
additional: string | null,
address: string | null,
zip: string | null,
premiumPayment: string | null,
item: ConfirmPolicyDocumentDto,
): string | undefined {
const lines: string[] = [];
const insuredName = strOrUndefDb(item.insuredName, insured);
if (insuredName) lines.push(`Asegurado: ${insuredName}`);
const additionalInsured = strOrUndefDb(item.additionalInsured, additional);
if (additionalInsured) lines.push(`Asegurado adicional: ${additionalInsured}`);
const legalAddress = strOrUndefDb(item.legalAddress, address);
if (legalAddress) lines.push(`Dirección: ${legalAddress}`);
const zipVal = strOrUndefDb(item.zip, zip);
if (zipVal) lines.push(`C.P.: ${zipVal}`);
const cadence = strOrUndefDb(item.premiumPayment, premiumPayment);
if (cadence) lines.push(`Pago de prima: ${cadence}`);
return lines.length ? lines.join("\n") : undefined;
}
function strOrUndefDb(a: string | undefined, b: string | null): string | undefined {
if (a != null && a !== "") return a;
if (b != null && b !== "") return b;
return undefined;
}
/** A JSON column the parser wrote as an array, read back as one. Anything
* else (null, DbNull, a legacy object shape) is an empty list rather than a
* crash — these columns are only ever populated by the parser, so a
* surprise shape means old data, not a caller to reject. */
function asArray<T>(value: Prisma.JsonValue | null): T[] {
return Array.isArray(value) ? (value as unknown as T[]) : [];
}
/** Compare identifiers the way a person would: case- and space-insensitive.
* VINs and plates are printed inconsistently ("8BPX206" vs "8BPX 206"). */
function norm(s: string): string {
return s.replace(/\s+/g, "").toUpperCase();
}