EFECTIVO is a journal, not a ledger. The office writes a numbered paper
receipt for money handed over the counter and then posts that same receipt
to the utilities ledger as reference `C<folio>`. Legacy summed the ledger
alone — ledger_repository.php reads `datosfreak`, materialized from DATOS2
only — but the migration flattened both tables into one `transactions`
table, so every balance counted each counter payment twice.
Confirmed against the live legacy database rather than inferred: of the 297
receipts written in 2026, 296 carry a matching DATOS2 posting. Six of them
post converted to pesos under a mistyped folio, which is why matching pairs
on folio and amount found fewer duplicates than exist — and why this
excludes the whole journal instead of a list of confirmed pairs. Only folio
13536 (CL 717, $400 USD) has no posting anywhere; that one wants a human.
The database qualifier is load-bearing. `SEGUROS 16_be` keeps its own table
also called EFECTIVO, and that one is the insurance line's only ledger —
nothing posts it anywhere else. Excluding by table name alone would erase
55,444.95 USD and 63,957.78 MXN across 102 customers, 99 of whom have no
other rows at all. Extending the qualified rule to the statement and the
customer file also gives those 99 back a statement that is not empty.
The same queries were missing the archive window the statement already had,
so the worklist and the book also counted a closed year twice for customers
floored inside an archive.
Measured on production, utilities MXN: NUMid 6 and 173 unchanged to the
cent, 501 unchanged at -10,874.33 (still the portal's number), 10 drops
2,362.20 -> -1,137.80 (exactly the 3,500.00 duplicate), 295 drops
14,377.46 -> 4,377.46 — which is what his statement already said. The
worklist and the statement now agree, which is the point.
Left alone deliberately: the movement browser, which is inventory rather
than balance and should still show what was captured; and stats()'s
outstanding rows, which turn on a client decision that is still open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
c6feae9 excluded imported periods from the current period outright. That is
right for the rows an archive spills into the following January — those already
sit inside the next year's BALANCE FORWARD, which is the sum of the whole
archive, so counting them again would double-book them and file a closed year's
row as current.
It is wrong for everything below the year start. Those rows are what `opening`
exists for, and for a customer whose newest BALANCE FORWARD lives *inside* an
archive they are the only carry there is: the corte skipped NUMid 295 in 2026,
so his floor is the archive's own January 1 and excluding it dropped his entire
2025 closing balance. His statement read 3,592.00 against a true 4,377.46.
So the rule is a window, not an exclusion: an archive row counts below the year
start and never at or above it. Applied identically to statement(), the
edo-cuenta-datos report and the customer-file card, which have to agree.
Spelled as a positive OR rather than NOT(tag AND date). `NOT (col LIKE '...'
AND ...)` is NULL for a row with no legacySourceTable, so the negated form would
have silently dropped every app-captured movement — the same NULL trap the
source-table exclusion was already fixed for.
Verified against prod, which now carries datos2@2025: exactly one customer is
affected and the book moves by his 785.46. NUMid 501 is unchanged at -10,874.33
and still matches the portal; 6 and 173 are unchanged to the cent; the two
customers whose archives spill into January 2026 still keep those rows out of
the current period.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The /clientes/:id ledger card is titled "Estado de cuenta" and links straight to
the statement, but its per-line tiles came from a groupBy with `voidedAt: null`
and nothing else — no balance floor, no source exclusion, no outstanding rule.
It was a raw lifetime sum, double-counting the pre-cutover history that each
BALANCE FORWARD row already absorbs, and the card said so in its own footnote
rather than being fixed.
Importing prior periods turned that from wrong into badly wrong. Every closed
year is now also held as its own tagged copy, so an unfloored sum adds each one
a second time on top of the opening balance that contains it. NUMid 501 read
-7,119.29 before the archives landed and -15,270.59 after, against a true
-10,715.29 — the gap being exactly the 2024 and 2025 closing balances.
The tiles now take the same three rules the statement takes, and agree with it
for all 600 customers sampled.
Two places needed the archives excluded explicitly, because the balance floor
does not do it:
- A customer whose newest BALANCE FORWARD lives inside an archive floors at
that archive's own January 1, so every row of it clears the floor. One
customer, 28 rows.
- The archives are not cleanly bounded. datos2@2024 carries rows dated 2022,
2023, 2025 and one in 2026; datos2@2025 two more. Those clear any floor and
land in the current year next to the live ledger's own copy of them.
That second point is a defect in 93f8171, not only in this card: statement()
and the edo-cuenta-datos report were both filtering the current period by
source and date without excluding the period tags, so four customers on the
dev book would have read a closed year's rows as current. Both are fixed here.
The portal already had it right.
The year's movement list on the card keeps showing every non-archive row, as
before — it is a list of what happened, not a balance.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The statement has been pinned to the calendar year in progress since bc74905.
Now that prior years are imported, the year becomes a choice: the current one
still reads the live ledger, and any earlier one reads that year's archive.
A period is selected by its `datos2@YYYY` tag, not by a date range. That is how
legacy addressed it — one table per closed year, `SELECT ... FROM `2025`` — and
the distinction is load-bearing: the archives carry rows dated a day or two into
the following January, so a date window would file them under the wrong year in
one direction and drop them in the other.
Two things the archive branch must not inherit:
- The balance floor. It exists to stop a later opening balance double-counting
the history it summarizes; for a period view that history is precisely what
is being asked for, so applying it would return nothing at all.
- The cash-source exclusion. It reproduces legacy's DATOS2-only datosfreak,
and an archive is DATOS2 rows already.
No fold into an opening balance either — the archive holds its own Jan-1 BALANCE
FORWARD row, which is the carry, listed exactly as legacy listed it.
The current period stays deliberately open-ended at the top. A period is a table
in legacy, not a date range, so whatever the office filed in it belongs to it,
including the future-dated rows the live ledger carries out to 2028. Bounding it
would hide them from every view.
`availableYears` reports the periods a customer actually has, so the picker never
offers a year that would render empty — "you had no activity in 2019" is a
different claim from "2019 was never imported", and only one of them is true.
The selector hides itself entirely for a customer with a single period, and a
year outside the list is a 404 rather than a silent fall back to the current one.
The same period rule lands on the printable twin (edo-cuenta-datos gains a
"Periodo (año)" parameter) and on the portal, where fetchLedgerRowsPlatform was
also filtering by date with no source exclusion at all — so period=2025 would
have returned the archive rows on top of that year's EFECTIVO receipts, counting
every prior-year payment twice. The portal's allowlist is now built per data
source and validated at the point of use: DreamHost holds the current year plus
one archive table, the platform holds however many were imported, and
fetchLedgerRowsLegacy interpolates the period as a table name, so a
platform-only year must not reach it — including on the fallback path when the
platform is unreachable.
Left alone: the /clientes/:id ledger card still shows the current year. It reads
transactionYear off the customers endpoint rather than the statement, it is a
summary that links to the full statement, and giving it its own year state would
duplicate the page it links to.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Legacy ran a year-end corte: it summed the closing year, wrote that total back
as each customer's Jan-1 BALANCE FORWARD, and started the next year clean. The
platform inherited those opening rows but never the years behind them — only
the current year's charges were ever staged, so every prior year held receipts
and no bills. Rendering one would have shown a customer credits with nothing
owed against them, which is worse than showing nothing.
The archives are whole-database Access snapshots named for the period they
hold, so `2025.accdb` is discovered by filename, staged, and loaded through the
existing DATOS2 branch — a snapshot's `datos2` is the identical shape, one year
older. Only the ledger and DATGRAL come out of a snapshot; everything else in
it is a year-stale copy of a live table. The cash side is deliberately left
behind: EFECTIVO is a lifetime journal, so the snapshot's copy is a subset of
the live one and importing it would double-book every prior-year receipt.
Period travels with the row, in legacySourceTable as `datos2@2025`. That tag,
not the date, is what a year view should filter on: the archives are not
cleanly bounded (2025 carries ten undated rows and two dated into 2026) and
legacy never filtered by date either — its reader is `SELECT ... FROM \`2025\``.
The tag also keeps legacyId safe, since it is a positional ordinal that
restarts at 0 in every archive and would otherwise collide row-for-row.
Two guards, because attaching a prior year by NUMid is the one thing here that
can go quietly wrong:
- Reissued numbers are skipped, not imported. Comparing each archive's
DATGRAL against the live one, 13 names moved since 2025 and 40 since 2024;
most are the same customer re-described, but a few are a different
household holding a recycled number, and filing their ledger under the new
owner would show a stranger's charges. Sharing any word of three or more
characters separates a rename from a reissue. Names are compared
legacy-to-legacy: `customers.name` has been through blank-name recovery,
and comparing to it reported 121 drifts where there are 13.
- Every period is checked against the corte identity it must satisfy —
SUM(year N) == BALANCE FORWARD(N+1) — and the result is reported per year.
A truncated export, a file dropped under the wrong year, or a botched
customer match all fail loudly here. 2025 reconciles 1,159/1,167 (99.3%)
and 2024 1,144/1,156 (99.0%); the recycle guard raised 2024 from 98.2%.
Balances are untouched: BALANCE_FLOOR_JOIN floors on the newest BALANCE FORWARD
per customer, so rows behind it are already excluded from every balance read.
Uploads go through the existing ingest endpoint, allowlisted by an anchored
`AAAA.accdb` pattern that also keeps a caller-supplied name inside the ingest
directory. The Operaciones page grows an entry point for an archive that has no
row yet, reading the period off the chosen file's own name.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`/clientes/:id` carries its own "Estado de cuenta" card, fed by
CustomersService.detail rather than by BillingService.statement, so the
previous commit left it reading the old way: the last 100 movements of all
time, newest first. Two pages, one label, two orders.
It now covers the current calendar year oldest-first, like the statement and
like the sheet the office prints. The `take: 100` is gone with it — capping a
descending list hid the oldest rows, but capping an ascending one would hide
the newest, and a single year is small (365 rows for the heaviest customer in
the book).
The per-domain totals above the list are untouched and still historical: they
are an unfloored groupBy, so they double-count every customer's opening
balance. That is a separate bug from this one; the card now says out loud that
those figures are lifetime, not this year's.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The office's EDO CUENTA sheet has always been a *year* statement: a balance
forward line dated January 1st, then that year's movements in the order they
happened. Both of ours read the other way — every year the customer ever had,
newest first — so staff comparing the screen against the printed sheet were
reading two different documents.
Movements are now bounded to the calendar year and returned ascending, on the
screen (/estado-cuenta/[id]) and in the printable `edo-cuenta-datos` report
alike.
Earlier rows are dropped from the *list*, not from the arithmetic. The balance
floor normally lands on January 1st already, so for most customers nothing
extra is dropped at all; when it doesn't — a customer the last legacy publish
skipped, or one that never had an opening balance — the earlier rows are
folded into a carried balance and shown as a single "saldo anterior" line.
Discarding them instead would restart every balance at zero on January 1st and
nothing would throw; the numbers would just be wrong, which is how the
double-counting bug survived for years. `opening` is exposed per currency and
per business line so the totals still reconcile against the last running
balance printed.
Two things the report was missing on its own are fixed while it is being
touched, since it must agree with the screen to the peso:
- it never applied the balance floor, so every pre-cutover row was counted
twice — once inside the opening balance and once as itself;
- its source-table exclusion used a bare `notIn`, and `NULL NOT IN (...)` is
NULL rather than true, so every app-captured row (which has no
legacySourceTable) silently vanished from the printout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The parser has been reading A.N.A.'s `TAX` cell since the ANA layout landed,
but `ParsedPolicy` had nowhere to put it, so the figure only ever reached a
review note and every OCR-confirmed policy was written with `tax` null — even
though the paper states it.
`TAX` now flows parser -> `extractedTax` -> `Policy.tax`, alongside the premium
fields beside it. GMX stays null: its certificate carries no premium at all, so
there is no tax on it either.
The other two cells stay out, for reasons worth keeping:
- `LOCAL TAX` is a separate levy with no destination column, and summing it
into `tax` would produce an IVA that no longer divides back to a rate —
which is the whole reason to store the figure. It reads 0.00 on every
policy seen so far; a non-zero one now raises a note saying the total will
not reconcile, instead of quietly inflating the IVA.
- `DISCOUNT` has no column and prints as a bare "-" when unused, which is
what makes the row positional rather than "find six amounts".
`taxRate` is left null by confirm. A.N.A. prints the amount, not the rate, and
back-dividing it would mint a rate the document never stated; the capture form
resolves one from the line of business instead.
The review screen gains derecho de póliza next to the new IVA field. It was
already parsed and already written on confirm, but never shown — and an IVA
with no fee beside it leaves the reviewer unable to see why premium + fee + tax
equals the printed total.
The spec's assertion moved off the note and onto the field, plus a check that
the row reconciles: 298.61 + 30.00 at 8% is 26.29, totalling 354.90. That
agreement is what proves the positional mapping landed on the right cells
rather than merely on six numbers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The capture form only ever had prima neta, derecho de póliza and comisión.
The Access form it replaces has seven figures, and the four that were missing
are the ones that make a policy paid in installments add up.
Adds recargo, IVA, prima total and forma de pago to the policy header, the
same breakdown per installment, and a per-line-of-business IVA rate.
IVA and prima total are the only derived figures:
base = prima neta + recargo + derecho de póliza
IVA = round(base * tasa)
total = base + IVA
The recargo is inside the taxable base. That is not a guess — policy 7006785
prints IVA 52.03 on 610.86 + 8.55 + 31.00, and leaving the recargo out gives
51.35, which matches nothing on the page. Both of its money rows are asserted
in premium.spec.ts. The recargo itself is never derived: the carrier quotes it,
so staff key it in, and the field is disabled on ANNUAL/SINGLE. Both derived
figures are stored rather than recomputed on read, and stay editable, because
the printed policy is the record of truth and a later rate change must not
silently restate what was issued.
The rate lives on PolicyType (seeded to 0.08, editable in Catálogos), which is
the legacy one-row IMPUESTOS / IMPUESTOS_AUTOS tables made configurable. The
rate applied is stamped on the policy so an old one reads back at its original
rate.
Per-installment, not two fixed slots on the header: a policy split into several
exhibiciones prices each payment separately — that is why the Access form drew
the money row twice — and a trimestral policy needs four, which the Access
layout could not hold.
Also fixes two losses in the ETL, which is how these went missing:
- `forma_pago` was marked consumed by the coverage sweep and then never
written to any column, so FORMA PAGO existed nowhere in the platform.
- `recargo` and the whole second money row fell into `coveragesJson` as
loose strings, mislabeled as coverage amounts.
transform_policies.py now writes all of it directly;
backfill_policy_premium_breakdown.py recovers it on a database that must not be
re-imported, and strips the migrated keys back out of coveragesJson. Both are
COALESCE-only, so a figure a human has corrected in the app wins.
IVA and TOTAL are NOT backfilled: they were unbound calculated controls on the
Access form, never columns, so there is nothing to recover and every migrated
policy reads null until it is edited.
The backfill warns on 5 annual policies that carry a non-zero recargo — a
contradiction that predates this change and is left for a human, not silently
corrected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"Volver a pólizas" on /polizas/captura/[id] dropped the reviewer at
/polizas, so getting back to the batch queue meant navigating in again.
Points at /polizas/captura and reads "Volver a captura", matching the
statement review screen, which returns to /recibos.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The policy OCR review header read
"Para revisarPágina 1700489616· PAMELA DENISE WAGONERLICENCIASANA".
`.row`, `.stack`, `.tag`, `.page-sub` and `.state-warn` are used across the
app but no rule ever defined them. Without `display: flex` the `gap` those
call sites pass does nothing, and JSX drops the newline between sibling
elements, so the header's spans concatenated. `.tag` rendered as prose rather
than as a chip for the same reason.
Defined against the existing design tokens: `.tag` takes `.badge`'s shape,
`.state-warn` is the gold sibling of `.state-error`, and `p.page-sub` keeps
the block margin while the inline form drops it so a flex row still centres.
Also dropped the hand-rolled "· " separator and margin from the OCR header —
the flex gap does that now, and the literal dot was left floating in it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The office books customers surname-first ("WAGONER, PAMELA") and carriers
print them given-name-first ("PAMELA DENISE WAGONER"), so the review screen
made staff retype a name the parser had already read. Comparing normalized
token sets makes the two orderings the same thing.
Only on the zero-hit path, where the policy number found nothing and a human
has to pick a customer anyway. The suggestions are written to a new
`customerSuggestions` column rather than `matchCandidates`, which the review
screen reads as policy-number hits, and they never set `matchedCustomerId` or
`confident` — matching on `Policy.policyNumber` is unchanged.
Two tiers, drawn where the real book has cliffs: EXACT (identical token sets)
and PARTIAL (containment, >=2 shared tokens, surname present). Of 1536
customers, 1487 have a distinct token set, so EXACT cross-person collisions
are ~0; loosen to surname + first given name and 131 (8.5%) collide, and 185
surnames are shared by 524 customers, which is why one token is never enough
and the surname must be printed explicitly. Replaying every book row as a
carrier would print it: 97.9% top-ranked correct, 1.2% a different row, all
but two of those the same human on a duplicate or variant row.
Normalization folds accents (OCR's MUNOZ reaches the book's MUÑOZ), drops
initials, Spanish particles, JR/S.A. DE C.V., and any token with a digit —
ANA prints the phone hard against the name as `Ph.3102001538`. Names over 8
tokens or 80 characters are refused outright, because GMX's especificación
has no field labels and the parser has handed its whole first page over as
`insuredName`.
Not used for utility statements: there the registrant genuinely is not the
customer, so the same trick would be wrong rather than noisy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The parsers are written against `pdftotext -layout`, and every policy-ocr
fixture is a verbatim excerpt of it. The runtime does not use it: it reads
`-bbox-layout` and rebuilds the page from word boxes, and that rebuild
collapsed all white space — no blank lines between blocks, one space
between columns. White space is the only thing marking a cell boundary on
these borderless forms, so the fixtures could not see any of it.
What it cost, on the GMX PVL especificación and the ANA driver's policy:
- `espectBlock` walks a wrapped cell until a blank line. With no blank
line it ran to the end of the page, so the insured's name came back as
the entire first page of the specification.
- `INSURED\s{2,}` and its siblings matched nothing, and the phone that
shares the name cell rode along with it ("PAMELA DENISE WAGONER
Ph.3102001538"), which matches no customer.
- `parseAnaDriverCoverages` splits SUM INSURED from PREMIUM by the
header's own column offsets. Without offsets, every premium was filed
as a sum insured.
So `toVisualRows` now emits a blank line where the reader sees one (a
vertical gap over 1.6 line heights — the two populations measure 0.3-1.1
and 2.1+, so the threshold sits in empty space) and pads each word to its
own column, using one space wherever words merely follow each other so
rounding drift cannot sprinkle false cell boundaries through prose.
Two independent guards, so neither failure can come back silently: the
ANA phone splits on a single space, and the especificación's cell walk is
capped at the one wrap the longest cell on that document actually uses.
Verified against the real PDFs: the especificación reads "EMMER .
KATHLEEN" with all 18 coverages named (they were "(sin nombre)"), and the
ten born-digital gas invoices parse byte-identically to before. The
scanned statements are untouched — they come through tesseract, not this
path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The BACKLOG claimed this was blocked on incomplete `policy_types` rows.
Querying the dev database says otherwise: AUTO (1316 policies) and LICENCIAS
(306) are both live and healthy, so ANA's two faces were never blocked at
all. Three separate things had been conflated.
What the parser now emits is a NAME, not an id -- it is a pure function over
text and must not reach for the database:
ANA AUTOMOBILE -> AUTO
ANA DRIVER'S POLICY -> LICENCIAS
GMX (both documents) -> MULT
`resolveLookups()` turns that into a foreign key at confirm, and does the
same for the carrier off the parser's provider code. It resolves, never
creates: a missing `policy_types` row means a human deleted it, and silently
recreating it would undo that with no record. An explicit `policyTypeId` /
`insuranceProviderId` on the confirm payload always wins.
GMX is MULT rather than INCENDIO because the caratula's own header reads
"Multiple Policy / Home" and the especificación is "PVL Hogar" -- one product,
two artifacts. MULT is the live row carrying 769 of them; INCENDIO is fire-only
and no policy in the book has ever used it.
The parser's provider code is not the carrier's row name, so PROVIDER_ROW_NAME
maps ANA onto "ANA SEGUROS", which is where the office's 738 ANA policies
already are.
--- the actual defect underneath -----------------------------------------
`policies.policyTypeId`, `policies.insuranceProviderId` and
`claims.adjusterId` are all ON DELETE SET NULL, and the lookups screen deleted
unconditionally. So deleting a lookup row returned 200 and silently blanked
the field on every row referencing it -- no error, nothing in the UI. That is
how M_EMPR disappeared and left 5 policies with no ramo, found months later
only by querying.
All three deletes now refuse while the row is in use, naming it and the count
("El tipo de póliza «M_EMPR» está en uso por 5 póliza(s)"). The schema-level
`onDelete: Restrict` the spec once recommended is deliberately not used: a raw
FK error is not something the operator can act on.
`20260815160000_policy_type_repair` cleans up what already happened:
- restores M_EMPR and re-points its 5 policies, scoped to
`policyTypeId IS NULL AND legacySourceTable = 'm_empr'` so it can never
claim a policy blanked for some other reason
- merges the duplicate "ANA" carrier (1 policy) into "ANA SEGUROS" (738).
OCR is about to start assigning the carrier automatically and two rows
would keep splitting the book. Written as joins, not subqueries, so both
statements are no-ops when either row is absent -- a subquery form would
resolve to NULL and blank the carrier off every ANA policy.
- does NOT restore INCENDIO. It is the other row the migration would have
produced, but the legacy INCENDIO table has 1 row that never loaded, so
the type has zero policies and restoring it would only put a dead option
in the type picker.
Verified by running the repair against the real broken dev data inside a
transaction and rolling back: 5 orphans -> 0, ANA/ANA SEGUROS -> one row with
739, and a second run in the same transaction changes nothing. The DDL half
matches `prisma migrate diff` exactly.
186 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A.N.A. is the Rosarito office's tourist auto book and the second carrier
the policy OCR pipeline reads. It ships two unrelated faces, and the split
is different from GMX's: GMX ships two documents about one policy, A.N.A.
ships two products.
AUTOMOBILE (SPECIAL POLICY FOR TOURISTS) insures a car; vehicle table,
9 numbered sections, one
LIMIT OF LIABILITY column
DRIVER'S POLICY (the office: "licencia") insures up to 5 named drivers;
no vehicle at all, 6 unnumbered
sections in a different order,
SUM INSURED + PREMIUM columns
The four automobile products the office sells (amplia / responsabilidad
civil, annual / by-the-day) are the same layout with different numbers, so
they get one parser rather than four.
These are born-digital portal PDFs, so pdftotext -layout returns exact
columns and the driver's-policy parser uses that: its two value columns
print the same shape (100,000.00 usd. / 18.70 usd.) with no per-row label,
so horizontal position is the only thing separating them. The split comes
from the header's own offsets, not a constant, because they shift between
products; when it can't be read every amount is reported as a sum insured
and the reviewer is told, rather than half the premiums being filed as
coverage limits.
Three things the layout will punish a naive read for:
- Each PDF prints its face two or three times (ORIGINAL, AGENT COPY, then
a receipt and three travel cards) and the pipeline concatenates every
page before parsing. The coverage walk is bounded to the first copy and
the driver list to the first POLICY HOLDER block. Unbounded, the licencia
returns the same person three times, which reads as a three-driver policy
rather than as a bug.
- The money row is read positionally off its header. An unused DISCOUNT
prints as a bare "-", so "find the six amounts" shifts every value one
column left on a discounted policy.
- Two five-digit numbers sit in the header band and only one is the agent
clave; the agent's street address is "BENITO JUAREZ 25 No.50 INT 38",
three lines above the No. cell holding the policy number.
Sections 6-8 print a PREMIUM where the others print a limit, so
ParsedCoverage gains an optional `premium` (GMX never fills it) and the
review table a column: $40 is what legal aid cost, not a $40 liability
limit. Exclusions follow the GMX rule and go in the risk label with a null
amount -- which matters more here, since a responsabilidad-civil policy
prints 0.00 for material damage and the two are identical on the page.
Also in this change:
- coveragePeriodDays is parsed and written. A.N.A. sells 3- and 4-day
policies; Policy.coveragePeriodDays defaults to 365, so a weekend policy
left at the default sits in the renewals window a year out. Derived from
the dates, cross-checked against the printed DAYS cell, disagreement
noted not resolved.
- Vehicles and named drivers are parsed, shown read-only in review, and
written as Vehicle / InsuredDriver rows on confirm, skipping any already
on the policy (VIN then plate; licence then name). The case that forces
the skip is confirming a renewal onto an existing policy. Nothing is ever
updated or deleted -- a changed plate lands as a second row for a human.
- Batch.provider is set from what the parsers actually claimed instead of
being hardcoded "GMX", so a mixed upload is labelled as mixed and the
header can never contradict its own documents. PolicyDocument.documentType
follows the same rule (was hardcoded GMX_POLICY).
- matchNote becomes TEXT. It was VARCHAR(191) and the note trail was sliced
to 190 chars, which cut the tail notes -- the "could not read X" ones.
- The policy detail page renders an array coveragesJson as a table. Both
shapes have always been possible there, but the object renderer was the
only one, so an OCR-confirmed policy showed a row per array index labelled
"0", "1", "2" with [object Object] as the value. ANA makes that routine.
GMX is untouched behaviourally; its two parsers now spread a shared empty
base instead of listing every null field. 29 new parser cases against
verbatim pdftotext output of three real ANA PDFs, 53 in the suite.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Confirmed with Luz, who handles GMX policies at the office: the three
fields the especificación does not carry are entered manually. The review
screen already supports it — all three are editable and `postPremium`
enables off the typed premium, so no code change was needed.
The parser's note said "esos datos están en la carátula de la póliza",
which now sends the reviewer looking for the wrong document. It says
"captúrelos a mano" instead, and names the consequence of leaving the
vigencia blank: `Policy.policyTo` is nullable and the renewals window
filters `policyTo: { gte, lte }`, so a policy confirmed without one never
matches and never gets a renewal notice — silently, permanently, with
nothing downstream erroring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GMX ships two unrelated documents for the same policy and the office
downloads both from the same portal. The parser only knew the English
caratula, so a `…-CondicionesParticulares.pdf` parsed to an almost
entirely empty row — including the policy number, which the matcher needs.
`parseGmx` becomes a dispatcher over `parseGmxCaratula` (unchanged
behaviour) and the new `parseGmxEspecificacion`. Both still report
`provider: "GMX"`: the matcher keys on the policy number alone and must
not care which artifact was uploaded.
The especificación has no tables. Coverages are found by anchoring on
`Límite … Responsabilidad:` and walking backwards for the heading, where a
heading is a short line *preceded by a blank line* — length alone cannot
tell one from the wrapped tail of the paragraph above it, and without that
condition coverages get named after the last word of the preceding prose.
Also fixed, both pre-existing:
- The policy number's group widths are not the same across the two
families (`007-037-…-0000-02` vs `07-037-…-00000-01`). The pinned-width
regex is replaced by a shape, so both read.
- The caratula's ZIP fallback pushed a note saying it had read the ZIP
from the address, then never assigned it.
Verified against the full ten-page real document: all 17 coverages,
amounts, deductibles and the excluded earthquake section match what is
printed. 24 parser tests (was 8), four of them regressions for ways this
layout can silently attach the *wrong* value rather than none.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The browser hard-required API_ORIGIN, so every move of the server — tailnet
today, the 192.168.1.0 office LAN later, a temporary demo domain in between —
meant editing the deploy env and redeploying. Worse, an http:// API origin on a
page served over TLS is blocked outright as mixed active content, which is what
broke the demo on https://jorgecuadros.freakma.com.
The browser now derives the origin from window.location the way a PHP app
would: same host on port 3001 over plain HTTP, or the same-origin /api path
under https (the reverse proxy strips the prefix). API_ORIGIN survives as an
optional override for a deployment that genuinely splits the two hosts, and SSR
still reads process.env because a derived origin is browser-only.
WEB_ORIGIN becomes a comma-separated list to match: one deployment is now
reached under several origins, and a credentialed fetch from an unlisted one
gets no CORS headers and fails.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every field the replication card showed was self-reported by the replica, and
the two most reassuring ones lie in the same failure. Seconds_Behind_Source
reads 0 when the I/O thread is disconnected — with no incoming event there is
nothing to measure staleness against — and Replica_IO_Running only says the
network thread is alive, not that it is receiving.
Two checks that ask the master instead:
- GTID drift, folded into the polled status. GTID_SUBTRACT(master, replica)
counts transactions the master executed that the replica has not, so a silent
disconnect shows up as a number that climbs instead of a lag that stays 0.
It also isolates transactions carried under the replica's OWN server UUID —
writes that exist nowhere on the master. There are currently 518 of them,
residue of the seed dump load; inert while log_replica_updates is off, and a
real divergence the day anyone promotes that box.
- A full row-by-row comparison behind a button, over the eight tables
my.jorgecuadros.com reads. GTIDs prove the replica applied everything the
master sent; they say nothing about rows changed here by another route, which
is the one failure the rest of the card cannot see.
The comparison hashes CONVERT(col USING binary), not CAST(col AS CHAR). CAST
transcodes into the connection character set, and the two servers do not agree
on it: the client inside the master's container negotiates latin1, the replica's
utf8mb4. Every accented character in a Mexican name, street or note then hashes
differently and the tool reports a permanent mismatch on exactly the tables that
hold free text. Caught by building it and running it — customers.name gave
3344437324815 against 3339150372121 under CAST, and 3339150372121 on both under
CONVERT. All eight tables now match byte for byte.
Verify is POST and audited despite reading nothing: it full-scans both servers,
so a prefetch or a refresh must not be able to start one.
Tests cover the GTID interval arithmetic, which is inclusive at both ends and
easy to get wrong by one in the direction that hides a gap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A full run_all.py pass truncates and rebuilds every table it owns from the
Access extract. That was harmless while the platform was a read-only mirror --
every row came from the extract, so wiping and rebuilding lost nothing. It
stopped being harmless once the platform started minting rows Access has never
heard of: allocated portal NUMids, customers created in the staff UI,
OCR-captured policies, app-booked ledger rows, uploaded documents.
REIMPORT is a button in /operaciones, so that was one click away.
native_guard.py counts what only exists here and exits 3; run_all.py runs it
before the first truncate and stops. Detecting an allocated NUMid needs the
staged Parquet -- the customer holds an ordinary-looking (utilities, DATGRAL,
'1172') ref, so "customer has no refs" cannot see it and only comparing against
the extract can. Missing staging is therefore treated as blocking rather than
as "nothing to protect".
The guard does not teach full mode to preserve anything: --sync already upserts
legacy rows against the existing refs and leaves the rest alone, and rebuilding
that inside full mode would re-implement it. --force-full (checkbox in the
REIMPORT confirm, recorded in the audit log) deletes them deliberately.
Verified against dev: clean before, exit 3 listing utilities/1172 with a
synthetic ref present, clean again after removing it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Customers created in the staff UI had no NUMid and so could not log in to
my.jorgecuadros.com at all: the id is a CustomerLegacyRef row, not a column,
and create() deliberately writes none.
Allocation is a staff action (POST /customers/:id/portal-access, MANAGER)
rather than part of create, because insurance is expected to move to the
platform before utilities and an insurance-only customer has no reason to
spend a utilities id.
The audit that decides which ids are reusable took three passes. "Owns no
rows" matches nobody -- migration gave all 1,171 NUMids a property and a
transaction. "No transaction in N years" also matches nobody -- every customer
carries a synthetic Jan-1 opening-balance row, so everyone looks active this
year. Subtracting that row is what makes dormancy measurable, and it leaves 4
never-used ids and 10 dormant ones on dev. Two further traps are encoded in the
queries: insurance/DATGRAL is a separate id space that reuses the sourceTable
name and runs past 4,000, and ACCOUNT CANCELED is a transaction line type, not
an account state -- all 8 customers carrying it have current-year activity.
Recycling ships switched off (numid.recycleEmpty, default false). Every
reusable id still exists in Access DATGRAL, and a --sync run reassigns refs
with ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE customerId, so an id recycled before the utilities
cutover is silently handed back to its Access owner.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BALANCE FORWARD rows are not movements. Access materialized one per
customer per year, dated Jan 1, holding the closing balance of everything
before it — that is what let the portal keep each year in its own table and
still show a correct running balance from one year's rows.
The platform imported those rows AND the real pre-cutover history they
summarize, and every balance aggregate summed the lot. NUMid 501 read
-10,469.29 on the receivables worklist against -14,065.29 on the customer's
own statement and on the legacy portal; the gap was two cash receipts from
2009 and 2012 that the 2026 opening balance had already absorbed.
The scale settles what it is: summed the old way the whole book came to
+20,605,447.86 MXN — the office owing its customers 20.6 million pesos.
Floored, it is -56,855.90. A receivables ledger cannot be 20M in credit.
Adds BALANCE_FLOOR_JOIN + NOT_SUPERSEDED and applies them to balances()
(page and count queries, which must agree), to stats()'s per-currency and
per-domain figures, and to the owing/in-credit split. The four stats()
aggregates moved from Prisma groupBy to raw SQL because groupBy cannot
express a per-customer floor.
statement() takes the same floor as a scalar, which is also what stops
FEE ANUAL and fee15 leaking in. Those are not in
STATEMENT_EXCLUDED_SOURCE_TABLES — that list reproduces legacy's
DATOS2-only `datosfreak` — and they were putting 2,092 pre-cutover fee rows
across 1,062 customers into the statement, skewing it by -5,129,764 against
the number those customers have been quoted for years. Dating rather than
source is the right test: a fee row *after* the opening balance is a real
charge and still counts.
movements() is deliberately left alone. It is a browser over captured rows
— "how much water did we capture in April" — and staff need the historical
rows visible, so it keeps totalling everything, the same asymmetry
NOT_OUTSTANDING already has.
stats() now separates the two questions it was mixing: movements,
ledgerCustomers, crossLineCustomers and the date range stay unfloored
inventory; everything under byCurrency/byDomain is a balance and is floored.
BillingService had no tests. Adds 13 covering the floor's failure modes —
it fails silently, so MIN-vs-MAX, `>` vs `>=`, the NULL branch for customers
with no opening balance, and the join/predicate alias pairing are each
pinned, plus the 501 arithmetic as a regression.
Verified through the real service against the live ledger: balances() and
statement() both return -14,065.29 for 501, matching the portal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SYNC ran `run_all.py --sync` without `--stage`, so it depended on staged
Parquet under migration/output. That directory is part of the image, not a
volume, so any redeploy wiped it and the job died on the first transform:
FileNotFoundError: '/repo/migration/output/stg_utilities/datgral.parquet'
Re-staging is also what makes the job's own label true — without it a sync
would replay whatever upload staged last, not the files currently in the
ingest folder.
Staging now counts as a numbered step when it runs, so the Operaciones
progress bar moves during the slowest phase instead of sitting empty.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Seconds_Behind_Source cannot answer "is it moving?". While the SQL thread
works through one large transaction the lag counter holds still — often at
0 — even though the replica is not caught up. The relay backlog does move,
and it comes out of the SHOW REPLICA STATUS the panel already runs, so this
costs no extra query and no connection to the source.
Adds applyProgress(), which reads Source_Log_File / Read_Source_Log_Pos vs
Relay_Source_Log_File / Exec_Source_Log_Pos and reports the fetched-but-not-
applied byte delta plus a percentage. Both positions are source binlog
coordinates, so they are only comparable while the two threads are on the
same file; across files the delta is meaningless (positions restart at ~4 in
each new file) and is reported as null rather than as a huge negative number.
The percentage deliberately stops at 99.99 while any backlog remains —
binlog positions are large enough that a real backlog of a few KB rounds to
100% and would render a lagging replica as caught up.
Not folded into `healthy`: a non-zero backlog is the normal state of a
working replica between fetch and apply, so alarming on it would cry wolf.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A REIMPORT takes ~110 seconds and, until now, showed only a scrolling log —
there was no way to tell "halfway" from "wedged", which mattered the day one
actually did wedge.
run_all.py emits "[paso i/N] name" before each step and the API derives
progress from the job log. Emitting the marker from the Python rather than
having the UI count STEPS itself means the step count is stated in exactly
one place; adding a step cannot desync the display. Progress is derived, not
stored, for the same reason: the log is already the record of what happened,
and a separate counter could contradict it, which is precisely the confusion
a progress display exists to remove.
While RUNNING, step i is IN PROGRESS rather than finished, so only i-1 count
as done. Counting i would show 100% while the final step was still working —
and the final step (blob_extract) is the slowest, so the bar would sit at
"100%" for the longest stretch of the job.
BACKUP and RESTORE are a single mysqldump with no steps and deliberately
render no bar; a fabricated percentage would be worse than none. The safety
backup that precedes a REIMPORT is likewise named explicitly instead of
showing 0%, which reads as stuck.
Pinned by job-progress.spec.ts, including the literal line run_all.py emits,
so a change to the Python format fails a test rather than silently blanking
the panel.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The panel reported "Error SQL: Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:" against a
replica that was healthy — both threads running, zero lag.
`\s` matches newlines in JavaScript, so `^\s*NAME:\s*(.*)$` let the `\s*`
after the colon walk past an EMPTY field's line break and capture the
following line. Last_SQL_Error is blank on a healthy replica and
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids happens to be printed immediately after it, so
the blank error field returned the next field's name as its value. Every
empty field was affected; the visible damage was that a healthy replica
rendered as broken, which is the worst direction for a health panel to fail.
Fixed with `[^\S\n]` — horizontal whitespace only — on both sides of the
field name.
Extracted as replicaField() and pinned by replication.spec.ts against the
verbatim output of the live replica, keeping the empty Last_SQL_Error
adjacent to Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids because that exact adjacency is what
broke. Also covers the literal "NULL" lag surviving as a distinct value from
empty, and a field name that is a suffix of another (Last_Error vs
Last_SQL_Error) not matching the wrong line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ops jobs run as a child of the API process, so no job can outlive it. When a
deploy landed 110 seconds into a REIMPORT, the child died and nothing was
left to finalize the row — it stayed RUNNING forever. Because startJob()
refuses to start while any RUNNING row exists, that one interrupted job
wedged the panel permanently with no way out from the UI; recovering it took
a manual UPDATE against the production database.
A fresh boot is proof that nothing survived, so this is unconditional rather
than filtered on age: "started recently" does not imply "still alive" here.
Rows are updated one at a time rather than with updateMany so the reason can
be APPENDED to the log. A job whose log simply stops mid-step with no
explanation is what made the first occurrence hard to diagnose.
Failure to reconcile is logged and swallowed: a wedged panel is bad, an API
that will not boot is worse.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
my.jorgecuadros.com serves customer balances from the Oracle VPS replica.
A replica whose SQL thread has stopped does not error — it keeps answering,
with data frozen at the moment it stopped — so nothing on the customer site
looks wrong and the only signal is a customer complaining about a stale
balance. This puts the failure somewhere a human sees it.
Deliberately does not trust the two fields an operator reaches for first.
Replica_IO_Running reports Yes while the SQL thread is stopped, because the
network thread keeps downloading binlog it will never apply; verified by
stopping SQL_THREAD and watching IO stay Yes. Seconds_Behind_Source reads
NULL whenever EITHER thread is down, so the card renders "sin dato" rather
than "0 s" — showing zero there would report an outage as perfect health.
The problem string is resolved most-specific-first for the same reason.
Shells out to the mysql client because the API has no MySQL driver and the
image already ships one. --ssl is required (the replica sets
require_secure_transport); --ssl-verify-server-cert=0 is deliberate and is
NOT the trade-off the website makes: this hop never leaves Tailscale and the
replica's firewall admits only this host, so WireGuard authenticates the
peer, whereas the DreamHost leg crosses the public internet and pins the CA.
The account behind it holds REPLICATION CLIENT and nothing else — it cannot
read a single row. REPLICA_DB_* unset is a supported state and renders "no
configurada", which is correct in dev and before cutover.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The "Flags del envío" panel lived inside the Servicios tab and only
governed the four bulk jobs. The pólizas half had no debug at all, so
there was no way to test a renewal notice without mailing a real
customer. The panel now lives in the /notificaciones shell above the
tabs and both halves read it.
`debug` on the renewal path diverts to the same override inbox as the
servicios jobs and deliberately does NOT write the `RenewalNotice` row
or advance the sweep's `lastSuccessfulAt` — the customer was not
notified, so nothing may gate the letter they are still owed.
`ignoreDayRestriction` and `useEmailLimit` stay estado-de-cuenta-only
and are labelled as such.
Both automatic sweeps are now operator-editable. The renewal cadence
was a `@Cron("0 6 * * *")` literal and servicios had no automatic run
at all; both now resolve through `NotificationScheduleService`, which
stores the cadence in `app_settings` and reinstalls the cron job on
save — no redeploy, no restart. Defaults preserve current behaviour:
pólizas 06:00 daily, servicios off. A scheduled run never inherits the
UI flags; it always sends for real.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
NOTIFICATION_ADMIN_EMAILS made "add Beto to the summaries" a redeploy —
the wrong unit of work for a list that changes when office staff change.
Adds `app_settings`, a key/value table for the configuration staff must
be able to change without a deploy, and `SettingsService`, which resolves
every key db -> env -> default and reports which of the three a value
came from. That ladder is what makes the move safe: a deployment behaves
exactly as before until somebody saves in the UI, and the screen can say
"this is still coming from the deployment" rather than implying somebody
chose it.
- new ability `setting:manage` (ADMIN) — deliberately above
`notification:send`, since redirecting the audit summaries is how
someone would quietly stop them being read
- GET/PUT /notifications/settings/admin-emails; read is open to any
logged-in user so the UI can display the list, write is gated
- resolved per job, not cached at boot, or we would reintroduce exactly
the restart-to-apply behaviour being removed
- a saved empty list means "nobody" and does NOT fall through to the env,
or clearing the field would keep mailing the people just removed
Credentials stay in env — see the model doc for where the line is drawn.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gitea-actions
rmancinasandClaude Opus 5